“But, Georgia can then keep his name off the ballot because he will not prove he is eligible. One state at a time!!!”
Of course, Obama could reason that he’s not going to win Georgia anyway, so it’s no real loss not to be on the ballot.
Now, if he were to be kept off a swing state ballot, that might really be something to cause him grief.
But, if Georgia keeps him off the ballot due to his failure to provide proper documentation, then other states can do the same thing. A new case was just filed in California. IL has a case and NH has a case and they can use this to decide to keep him off their ballots too.
It *IS* a real loss. He isn't LOSING Georgia, he is getting KICKED OFF THE BALLOT in Georgia because he was DISQUALIFIED.
I have been blowing this trumpet for three years. If he gets kicked off the ballot in ANY state, the media will not be able to explain why he would allow this to happen rather than just show an original birth certificate. The ONLY person that would do such a thing is one that has no other choice.
If he gets kicked off the ballot in ANY state, it will create more inquiry and more doubt about his legitimacy. If he cannot prove his legitimacy, it will cause people to question the legality of all of his acts. This has the potential to force him out of office and rescind much of what he has done. (although I think that will be too much to ask for.)
This could turn out to be a very big deal.
I think this is about the Democrat primary ballot. Since he has no national opponent, it would be meaningless as far as him receiving the party’s nomination. What other impact it could have, I don’t know.
I have written my governor, Christie of NJ and the Secretary of State to have obummer prove his eligibility. Now if that happens we will have something. I am not holding my breath on this though.
I respectfully disagree. It's NOT losing GA that matters; it's how the liberals are going to explain that 0b0z0 couldn't "prove his eligibility" in court!
This will embolden the cowards of all stripes to ask "WHY COULDN'T HE PROVE IT?????"
It may also embolden some SoSs in several states to ask the same question.
0h0m0's middle-finger-in-the-dam would be broken!
PS. To all pinged: I'm trying to catch up!
Seems to me a ruling like this in one state, could set a precedent for other states.
Remember, eight states have determined that their electoral college votes will be given to the candidate who wins the popular vote. Imagine the global doomage level cranial blow outs if the Republican won the popular vote by 1/2 million and by default won California, Massachusetts, Hawaii and Illinois?
True, but it will set a precedent for other states to follow. In theory, it could have a significant domino effect.