Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: humblegunner
Is that what I was trying to do?

In effect, yes.

Further, I need not explain myself to anyone. Not even you.

I checked the list this morning.

You're not on it.

Go look stuff up.

I sought a cogent rebuttal to the issues raised in BC's piece. Instead, you respond with juvenile one-liners and supercilious assertations with commands to 'look stuff up'. Apparently you have no real argument against the contentions raised by Brice, but just enjoy posting snarky replies to anyone who questions your abrupt dismissal of issues that, for conservatives, reflect poorly on Texas Governor Rick Perry. O.K. I had once thought Rick Perry might be my fall-back candidate if Sarah Palin declined to run but at this point, I'm beginning to think not. Perry is going to be vetted, one way or another, whether his supporters like it or not. That cannot and should not be avoided. If the only response to negative assertions about Perry's record from his supporters are arrogant brush-offs, devoid of facts but with lots of attitude, he won't survive the vetting. So be it.

115 posted on 08/20/2011 1:37:56 PM PDT by Jim Scott ( "Game On!" - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Scott
you respond with juvenile one-liners and supercilious assertations with commands

Kind of like when you wanted me to research my position for you?

I had once thought Rick Perry might be my fall-back candidate if Sarah Palin declined to run but at this point, I'm beginning to think not.

By God, we're all lost without you! Say us a prayer.

Look, just because someone writes something does not mean it is true.
Especially if someone sets out to write a Perry hit-piece.

I hope you are sophisticated enough not to fall for that.

If the only response to negative assertions about Perry's record from his supporters are arrogant brush-offs, devoid of facts but with lots of attitude, he won't survive the vetting.

I fear you overestimate my impact upon world events.

Hey, lot's of folks do. It's OK.

119 posted on 08/20/2011 1:44:44 PM PDT by humblegunner (The kinder, gentler version...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Scott
Perry is going to be vetted, one way or another, whether his supporters like it or not. That cannot and should not be avoided. If the only response to negative assertions about Perry's record from his supporters are arrogant brush-offs, devoid of facts but with lots of attitude, he won't survive the vetting. So be it.

I'm of the mind Perry knows well he's going to have to come clean on some of these things which are ,honestly, alarming people.

Texas as become a "safe haven" for Muslims and their population in the thousands now. That is disturbing IMO. I understand much of this with the Khan was business dealings...but Khan definately adheres to Islamic agendas of usbmission to Islam...in peaceful ways. One is to populate an area until the numbers require representation in governance. Again...disturbing to say the least.

So how will Perry address this if President. It doesn't sit well with me at all.

154 posted on 08/20/2011 2:35:34 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson