To: Jeff Winston; PA Engineer
In this very thread I have made at least seven factual assertions. Not a single one of them has been factually refuted. Why? Because every one of them was true. You, sir, made assertions without providing evidence. You made claims that fly in the face of what I can see with my own eyes. I subjected this document to my own deconstruction, and did not rely on what others claimed and made measurements that show your claims to be false. Ergo, they are NOT factual nor true. They are twaddle. You continue to repeat similar claims without evidence. Please provide some graphical evidence of your claims. I submit you have earned the statement I made about the level of your cluelessness.
145 posted on
05/19/2011 10:51:16 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft product "insult" free zone.)
To: Swordmaker
You, sir, made assertions without providing evidence. You made claims that fly in the face of what I can see with my own eyes. I subjected this document to my own deconstruction, and did not rely on what others claimed and made measurements that show your claims to be false. Ergo, they are NOT factual nor true. They are twaddle. You continue to repeat similar claims without evidence. Please provide some graphical evidence of your claims. I submit you have earned the statement I made about the level of your cluelessness. Please see post 144 before posting such things.
To: Swordmaker
You, sir, made assertions without providing evidence. You made claims that fly in the face of what I can see with my own eyes. I subjected this document to my own deconstruction, and did not rely on what others claimed and made measurements that show your claims to be false. Ergo, they are NOT factual nor true. They are twaddle. You continue to repeat similar claims without evidence. Please provide some graphical evidence of your claims. I submit you have earned the statement I made about the level of your cluelessness. Also see posts 147 and 153.
I challenge you to refute what I've posted.
If you are unable to do so, then I expect a sincere apology for your claim that my posts are "not factual," "not true," "without evidence," "twaddle," and "clueless."
I would also appreciate an apology for your earlier ad personal attack on me.
To: Swordmaker
I also challenge you to explain the same things I asked PA Engineer to explain, in post 153.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson