1) He was British by his birth - from his Father’s citizenship.
2) He was Indonesian by adoption - from his Mother’s subsequent Husband.
3) While an adult (in college, grad school) he identified himself as a foreign student (implied by limited information known about this time of his life).
4) While an adult, he traveled under a non-US passport to a country (Pakistan) which banned US travelers at that time. (surmised, not proven)
Given these disqualifying issues, it is irrelevant where (Hawaii, Washington State, Canada, Kenya) he was born. Mr. Barry Sotero is not a Natural Born Citizen.
1) He was British by his birth - from his Father’s citizenship.
2) He was Indonesian by adoption - from his Mother’s subsequent Husband.
3) While an adult (in college, grad school) he identified himself as a foreign student (implied by limited information known about this time of his life).
4) While an adult, he traveled under a non-US passport to a country (Pakistan) which banned US travelers at that time. (surmised, not proven)
Given these disqualifying issues, it is irrelevant where (Hawaii, Washington State, Canada, Kenya) he was born. Mr. Barry Sotero is not a Natural Born Citizen.
________________________________________________________________________
Outstanding!
++++!!!!
The BC/COLB/Place of birth are not relevant. When Rudy Giliani says “he was born in the country”. The response needs to be - so what, what about jus sanguini.
The next round of billboards just need to say this:
“jus sanguini
Translantion: Born a Brit, ain’t legit.”
It's nice to know that the lack of evidence now qualifies as evidence. Maybe he identified himself as a Martian. There's no evidence of that, either.
4) While an adult, he traveled under a non-US passport to a country (Pakistan) which banned US travelers at that time. (surmised, not proven)
We know that first part's not true. A travel advisory -- even a travel warning -- isn't a travel ban. That's been established and repeated dozens if not hundreds of times, but it doesn't sink in.
Maybe the fact that you're wrong about that part counts as evidence for your surmise in the second part. I guess that's how logic works nowadays.
Good summary