Posted on 09/13/2010 5:27:33 AM PDT by red meat conservative
As we battle for the heart and sole of the Republican Part, it is unfortunate that some on our side are distorting Mike Castle's record in an attempt to make him more palatable to conservative voters. They have such disdain for conservative challenger Christine O'Donnell, and desire any chance to have another Senator with an R next to their name, that they are willing to lie about Castle's 20+ year career in Washington. They naively believe that there is an advantage to having 51 seats that are fully controlled by people like Castle, who are to the left of Arlen Specter, as opposed to 50 seats that are not held hostage by socialist extremists.
Have these people learned nothing about the policy and politics of the Republican Party over the past 16 years? What is the purpose of winning back control of both houses of congress if it will lead to the same results as last time? In other words, we will have a slim majority that is held hostage by RINO Senators, in which we will receive the blame for wrongheaded policies that result from initiatives that are anything but Republican! Then we will get crushed in the next election and keep repeating the vicious cycle that was 1995-2006. We need run and govern as conservatives or not run at all.
(Excerpt) Read more at redmeatconservative.blogspot.com ...
I prefer my liberals have a (D) after their name. One McCain is quite enough.
Just thing gang of 14 and you have your third in command after McLame, Gramnesty.
Why not also tell the truth too about the supposed Conservative scammer the Tea Party folks forgot to checkout before they endirsed her:
From Bill Kristol’s Weekly Standard:
Citing “Mental Anguish,” Christine O’Donnell Sought $6.9 Million in Gender Discrimination Lawsuit Against Conservative Group ...and falsely implied she was taking master’s degree classes at Princeton.
Court documents obtained Saturday by THE WEEKLY STANDARD reveal surprising new details about the gender discrimination and wrongful termination lawsuit filed by Christine O’Donnell in 2005 against her former employer, the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, a conservative non-profit based in Delaware.
O’Donnell, who is now challenging moderate congressman Mike Castle in the September 14 Delaware GOP Senate primary, sought $6.95 million in damages. In a court complaint, she extensively detailed the “mental anguish” she suffered after allegedly being demoted and fired because of her gender. And, although she didn’t have a bachelor’s degree until this year, O’Donnell implied she was taking master’s degree classes at Princeton University in 2003.
O’Donnell alleged in a July 1, 2005 complaint filed in district court that she had been demoted because ISI’s conservative philosophy dictated that women must be subordinate to men. She claimed she was fired when she contacted the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regarding her demotion. ISI told the Delaware News Journal that she had been “terminated for operating a for-profit business.”
O’Donnell’s finances, honesty, and stability have been called into question in light of her false and strange claims. The court complaint raises further questions on all fronts. O’Donnell, who made an annual salary of $65,000 at ISI as director of communications and public affairs, sought up to $6,952,477 million in damages, claiming, among other allegations, that ISI had defamed her and had violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. O’Donnell sought:
—Up to $3,952,447 in “Direct Damages, including back pay” and “lifetime lost income and liftetime damage to reputation.”
—Up to $500,000 “for emotional distress, humiliation, emotional pain, embarrassment, depression.”
—Up to $3.5 million in punitive damages for “willful, legally-malicious and outrageous conduct” by ISI.
O’Donnell claimed that ISI had caused her to suffer “mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, mental and physical pain and anguish”—and that, according to an amended complaint, she had to “seek treatment for her distress.”
According to O’Donnell’s July 1, 2005 complaint submitted by herself:
Miss O’Donnell was and is profoundly humiliated by this demotion of being asked to perform clerical and administrative tasks, after appearing on national television as a media and public relations expert and spokeswoman, for a man who was hired straight out of college as ISI’s receptionist and clerical assistant, and whom she had been asked to train previously [emphasis in original]. [...]
For at least six months after being fired, Miss O’Donnell suffered enormous pain, cried frequently at the sense of personal loss and failure caused by ISI, and at the sense of injustice, and could not sleep at night, often wide-awake, replaying the whole scene in her mind, until 5:30 am, and has suffered from understandable and resulting depression.
“Miss O’Donnell’s mother and sister both noticed and spontaneously told her at the time, prior to litigation, that she was differently [sic], and urged her to seek medical evaluation,” according to the complaint.
An amended complaint, filed by a lawyer on behalf of O’Donnell in September 2005, claimed that O’Donnell did, in fact, “seek treatment for her distress.”
“Ms. O’Donnell has suffered extreme emotional harm as a result of the actions taken or not taken by ISI, and statements made by and on behalf of ISI, in the form of grief, shame, humiliation, embarrassment, anger, chagrin, disappointment and worry. This harm has caused physical manifestations, and caused Ms. O’Donnell to seek treatment for her distress.”
The amended complaint also claimed that in one instance a male colleague made a lewd comment to her. “On one occasion during her employment, a co-worker, Mr. Cain, in connection with Ms. O’Donnell’s efforts and work on the Gala, ordered or stated to Ms. O’Donnell to ‘strap it on,’ which was a crude and demeaning reference to an artificial male sexual organ used by some females in order to act like a male in sexual acts,” the complaint alleged. “To Ms. O’Donnell’s knowledge and belief, Mr. Cain was never disciplined or reprimanded for making this offensive statement.”
Curiously, the July 2005 complaint alleges that “ISI violated its promise to allow Miss O’Donnell time to take master’s degree classes at Princeton,” thus causing a loss of “earning power.”
“Moreover, Miss O’Donnell has lost the increased earning power that a Master’s degree from Princeton would have created. In the future with proper finances, Miss O’Donnell should probably be able to return and complete that program, however that increased earning power has been disrupted and delayed for at least three years, given college application cycles, and the damage to her reputation, creating a loss of increased earning power estimated at up to $50,000 per year, for three lost years at $150,000.”
According to the amended complaint, O’Donnell had considered not taking the ISI job because “she had applied for admission to a Master’s Degree program at Princeton University, to start in the fall of 2003, and was concerned that the ISI position would not fit with her plans.”
But, in fact, O’Donnell had not yet received her bachelor’s degree at that time and had not been accepted to a master’s program at Princeton.
The Delaware News Journal reported on Saturday: “[O’Donnell’s] alma mater, Fairleigh Dickinson University, sued her in 1994 for about $4,000 in unpaid tuition. She satisfied the debt in 2003 and received her diploma this month after completing an additional course.” O’Donnell’s campaign manager Matt Moran acknowledged in an email received at midnight Saturday that O’Donnell “was not admitted to a Masters Degree program at Princeton. She took an undergraduate non-matriculated class at PU on constitutional government.” Moran has not yet replied to a subsequent email asking why O’Donnell claimed “ISI violated its promise to allow Miss ODonnell time to take Master’s degree classes at Princeton in return for a salary as small as $65,000 for her credentials and expertise, and as a result of ISI’s breach of its agreement, Miss O’Donnell was forced to quit her courses at Princeton, losing her time and money invested in this course of study at Princeton. [emphasis added].”
O’Donnell decided to drop the lawsuit in 2008, claiming that she couldn’t afford the legal fees. “I definitely felt that there was gender discrimination,” O’Donnell told me in a September 2 phone interview, but she declined to elaborate. “I believe that right now that if we unite in the conservative movement, the bigger picture is at stake, and we need to put that behind us.”
Still, the implication that O’Donnell was accepted to a master’s degree program at Princeton is the latest of many false statements to come to light in recent weeks. Conservative radio host Dan Gaffney challenged O’Donnell on September 2 for claiming she had won two out of three counties in Delaware when she ran for Senate in 2008. In fact, she didn’t win any.
According to her financial disclosure form, O’Donnell only made $5,800 last year. “I made more than $5,800,” O’Donnell told me in the September 2 interview, but said she did not have to and would not disclose how much.
As the Delaware News Journal notes, O’Donnell “has denied that she was ever sued by her mortgage company or that a foreclosure sale date had been set.” But:
“During her 2008 run, her mortgage company sued her, claiming she stopped making payments in October 2007, according to court documents. It received a judgment and the home was set to go to sheriff’s sale, according to court documents. She sold it days before to her then-boyfriend, who was acting as her campaign legal counsel, she said.”
“She has a shady history and we’re not talking ancient history,” conservative radio host Dan Gaffney tells THE WEEKLY STANDARD. “We’re talking current history, and she lies about it.”
“You know, everyone is allowed to have financial difficulties,” Gaffney continued. “Everyone is allowed to take time to go to college. But misrepresenting yourself, lying about it, that’s what I have a problem with. I don’t understand why she has to lie about stuff she doesn’t have to lie about.”
Even more disturbing, says Gaffney, is O’Donnell claim in her recent WEEKLY STANDARD interview that her home and campaign office were broken into and vandalized and burglarized in 2008. O’Donnell did not report the alleged burglary and vandalism to the police, but suggested that Castle supporters may have been the ones who committed the alleged crime.
“If that’s true and she didn’t call the police, she’s not only endangering herself but her neighbors,” says Gaffney. “She also likes to say there are people hiding in her bushes.”
“It doesn’t sound stable when you add it all up
The only way to get out of this mess is Counter Revolution. I hate to say it but the Republicans will not stand and deliver.
If only a portion of the article is true then it’s enough to seriously question the stabability of the women and her ability to entrusted with info/data she’ll be allowed to see as a Senator. I know this has been out there so it’s claimed but why does it just now surface again in this race?
Regardless, she is toast on the General if she wins the Primary.
The real question is, why didn't Conservatives such as the Tea Party Org and Sarah Plain’s staff check her out before they endorsed this phony wacko.
Isn’t it amazing! Even with all her faults and missteps O’Donnell is still better than the entrenched RINO. She scares the snot out of the established scum in power today. At least voting for her forces term limits even if Congress won’t vote for it.
And O’Donnell is out polling him this morning!!
She strikes me as the JD Hayworth of the East: lots of warts, but more reliably conservative. Let’s hope the tea party is more advanced in its recruiting the next time around.
>>Let’s hope the tea party is more advanced in its recruiting the next time around.<<
I’m not so sure the TEA party actually recruited her did they? Perhaps a small group did but not the major players in the TEA party. I thought they started backing her after she announced that she was running.
That sounds likely, but the GOP will only be remade if and when, among other things, its tea party wing has the ability to assure strong, not goofy, conservative candidates run nationwide.
Keep in mind that this is the first year that the conservative masses have really gotten involved like they are now. A few years of experience will hone the skills I think.
Again I agree. This is their first full year of involvement and 2012 should keep them in the game for another 26 months. Then let’s hope some of the best of them have a chance to join the new GOP administration—then the outsiders will really start to become insiders.
Oh.
The old open-the-sealed-court-documents-three-days-prior-to-the-election method.
Last used three times (by Obama) to get him through Obama’s democratic primary, first IL senate electon, and then the IL US senate elections.
Funny that Obama (er, Castle) finds it useful against a conservative republican opponent to open up court documents against an opponent. When Obama can't even release his papers barring him from practicing law in IL.
From releasing ANY of his (now sealed) transcripts and supposed journal articles and term papers and college applications ....
The audacity of the left and the RINOs using past records to try to slam opponents while helping O cover his past is stunning.
What’s more stunning is the fact that so many of the American population is falling for the rouse.
Please note that her supporters are not angry that she is now demonstrated, in her own words and signed documents she personally prepared, to be a nut job and/or a scammer. They are angry that she got caught and the public now knows about it!
So it is with scammers. They always position themselves as the victim.
Please see # 17
PS, it was far from the Left. It was Bill Kristol and the Weekly Standard.
>>PS, it was far from the Left. It was Bill Kristol and the Weekly Standard.<<
Far? You don’t think that Bill Kristol is RINO at least? I did include RINOs in my post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.