[Sacajaweau]

She's doing it right...."If it was Bush".....

Everyone can relate....

[beethovenfan]

No!

[Paladin2]

You betcha, H NO!

[pillut48]

1:00 pm CST

[freedumb2003]

>>
Poll Results

Thank you for voting.

Do you think Sarah Palin went to far to suggest President Obama’s reaction to the oil spill has been influenced by political contributions from oil companies?
Yes 25%
No 74%
I don’t know 1%
<<

I guess the results are “to” overwhelming...

[Diogenesis]

Proof Gov. Palin is correct
and has more courage in her little finger than all of the US Congress-traitors.

"Obama biggest recipient of BP cash
BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million
to federal …with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama"

"U.S. exempted BP's Gulf of Mexico drilling from environmental impact study"

"Obama admin exempted BP's Gulf drilling from environmental impact study "

"Obama White House and British Petroleum (BP), which pumped $71,000 into Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign
are covering up the magnitude of the volcanic-level oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico"

"Obama sheltered BP's Deepwater Horizon rig from regulatory requirement"

"Red Flags Were Ignored Aboard Doomed Rig "

"US allowed drilling 'without required permits"

"U.S. Said to Allow Drilling Without Needed Permits
The federal Minerals Management Service gave permission to BP …
to drill in the Gulf of Mexico without first getting required permits "

[thefactor]

Shouldn't it have been "too far"?

Pet peeve.

[television is just wrong]

these are journalists, and do not know the difference between: to, too, and two?

[nutmeg]

FReeped!

[RichInOC]

No. It’s completely fair game. That’s a stupid question. Next.

[THX 1138]

"to" = "too"

NY Daily News = morons

[Jack Hydrazine]

The question that should have been asked is this.

“Did the Sarahcuda not go far enough in her calling out Obama on BP donations?”

Now what do you think the answer ratio would have been if the question had been phrased that way?

[MNJohnnie]

Leftist newspaper website and even to it’s slanted poll question is over whelming favorable to Palin.

[Carley]

76% NO

23% Yes

And this is the Daily News...........

How long before they remove the poll or stop counting the NO votes.

[wiggen]

I can’t imagine why they keep stepping up to the plate and making comments that she hits out of the park.Lets hope they never stop.

[marron]

While she’s at it, she might mention from time to time his connections with investment bankers.

[FreeperDoll]

not far enough! Palin power 2012

[freedomfiter2]

Palin isn’t smart enough to think up the right response so consistently (probably noone is). She has great instincts just like Reagan.

[bmwcyle]

Yes 23%
No 76%
I don’t know 1%

[DaxtonBrown]

[Palin wondered why the “mainstream media” wasn’t looking harder at President Obama’s “connection” to the oil companies.]

Palin and Coulter for that matter, really know how to go for the throat and do ‘gotcha’ digs. How is Obama to respond? No, those BP donations weren’t influence buying? And the media is now forced to ask the question. Talk about carving people up.