Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/23/2010 10:12:38 AM PST by Sergeant Tim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Sergeant Tim

It’s a nice thing he never attacks fellow Republicans huh? lol


2 posted on 02/23/2010 10:14:35 AM PST by GeronL (Political Philosophy: I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

It’s a nice thing he never attacks fellow Republicans huh? lol


3 posted on 02/23/2010 10:14:45 AM PST by GeronL (Political Philosophy: I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sneakers; SoCalPol; sofaman; sofas dad; soloNYer; sono; Sparko; Springman; SRJeff; StarFan; ...

Ping!


4 posted on 02/23/2010 10:15:33 AM PST by Sergeant Tim (In the War on Terror, there is no place to run from here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

Who in heck ever said Beck was like Reagan?

I’m seeing a pattern with these posts.


5 posted on 02/23/2010 10:15:49 AM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

levin is just jealous of beck’s success.


9 posted on 02/23/2010 10:20:23 AM PST by ken21 (i am not voting for a rino-progressive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

Glenn Beck is a celebrity. He’s not a serious thinker. A nice chap, but no intellectual.

Long as everyone knows that, we’re fine. And I think he’d be the first guy to admit it.


11 posted on 02/23/2010 10:22:38 AM PST by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

Beck gave a heckuva speech at CPAC and days later the caterwauling hasn’t stopped.

Beck’s rather simple message: conservatives, you need to take back your party. Its the same thing you hear here on FR 365 days a year.

Levin’s got his role to play, and so does Beck. Sarah’s got her role to play and so does Hannity. If we’re in the process of turning around a rout, we’ve got a lot of people to thank, and if we aren’t going to bankrupt this country, we’ve got to be very clear about our principles. Electing more Dem-lite politicians will only break this country five minutes slower than electing Obamists who give us the full dose. We need to insist that supposed conservatives act like it. And the “bipartisan” Repub hacks need to be retired from office once and for all.


12 posted on 02/23/2010 10:22:41 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim
Thanks for the post. Rush and Levin are right. Our only chance to stop "train wreck Obama" is through the Republican party.

One would have to be brain dead not to know that both parties are to blame for excessive spending, but only one of the two parties plans on stopping.

13 posted on 02/23/2010 10:23:27 AM PST by Neverforget01 (The problem is the doing, not the talking....Gov Haley Barbour)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

That’s a straw man title if ever there was. NO ONE would remotely compare Beck with Reagan. Or any radio yakker with him for that matter.


14 posted on 02/23/2010 10:23:35 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim
First off these snipes at Beck from Levin are starting to get old. I like both of those guys, but if it comes down to it, I'm siding with Beck.

Levin should stop this pissing contest because at the end of the day, he won't win it. I've seen several articles now from him slamming Beck and not one peep from Beck about Levin...at least that I know of. It sincerely does smack of jealousy now.

16 posted on 02/23/2010 10:27:24 AM PST by lovecraft (Specialization is for insects.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

Beck cited the very reasons I didn’t vote GOP in 2006. The Hasterts and Delays of that era screwed all of us. President Bush’s lack of fiscal restraint also led to the debacle of 06.

If you refuse to fire those that are spending us into bankruptcy due to party allegiance...I don’t understand you.


19 posted on 02/23/2010 10:29:08 AM PST by Badeye (Still pretending Long Island is Manhattan, willie? (laughing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

My hubby and I both went to Rand Paul for eye exams ONE TIME. I also took my newborn (2.5 pounds, 3 mos. premature) to him for an eye check as advised by Vanderbilt UMC. He was extremely rude to all of us, and not gentle with my son. We have since found an equally qualified doc who actually treats people well. Have been with her for 4 years now.

No votes for him.


25 posted on 02/23/2010 10:30:50 AM PST by kimmie7 (THE CROSS - Today, Tomorrow and Always!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim
If that was not a declaration of war, then two Presidents have violated Congress's intent in Afghanistan.

This is what a Congressional Declaration of War sounds like:

The advantage of securing a Congressional Declaration of War, is that if a liberal votes for a Declaration of War as per the Constitution, he can't very well go back after the fact and wail, "IT'S BUSH'S FAULT!!" Hey, buddy -- you said "WAR" and you voted for it, capische?

The whole idea is to get Congress to make an up-or-down commitment on War, and not allow a bunchy of weaselly wiggle-room. Rand Paul (who, as a simple matter of fact, is more hawkish on Afghanistan and on military tribunals for Terror suspects than is dear old dad Ron Paul) is not advocating an outlandish position here, IMHO.

27 posted on 02/23/2010 10:34:32 AM PST by Christian_Capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim
On the issue of Rand Paul. I think people should really look into some of the things he has said like this comment about Iran.
"Iran feels threatened because we have troops in Iraq and troops in Afghanistan... we have to understand their perspective, that they feel threatened." Rand Paul

He also says that our military recruitment is similar to Hitler! This guy is a nut people.
“They always have things in there you don’t know about. I’ll give you a good example. With the No Child Left Behind legislation, in that legislation there’s a small line that says all 14 year olds upon entering high school, his information will be given to military recruiters. My son just started high school… and we just happened to see this paper and if we had not seen that paper his information would have been to Army recruiters automatically…they shouldn’t be taking all 14 year olds, I wrote down that this reminded me of when Napoleon comes back from Elba he’s already killed all the 16, 17, 18, 19 year olds… he has to recruit 14 year olds. Same with Hitler…”. Rand Paul

For more on the craziness that is Rand Paul see HERE and HERE
29 posted on 02/23/2010 10:38:59 AM PST by markedmannerf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

I didn’t have to read any further than the contrary to fact “carpetbomb” statement to know Levin is making it up so he can find a problem to have.

It’s not like Reagan’s most famous quote regarding liberals was a generalization or anything....


30 posted on 02/23/2010 10:39:45 AM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

I am sure you know more than me when it comes to Beck through your contacts with Mark but I too have been concerned about his convoluted message for a very long time.

Both parties are the same comments are nonsense and like Mark says destructive to this Conservative ascendency.

Going on tour with Oreilly who is in the tank for this administration and using his show to help rebrand him to conservatives as a good and funny guy?

I have listened to Beck respond to this criticism and back off some of this both parties rant in the last couple days.

In your opinion do you think he can change and be trusted ?

Or will he continue to disrupt our attempt to elect as many of Conservatives within the party come this November?

Thanks


33 posted on 02/23/2010 10:48:45 AM PST by Three if by government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

Beck put on a good show!


34 posted on 02/23/2010 10:49:56 AM PST by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

“Ronald Reagan would never have loosely generalized about conservatives and the Republican Party because like a surgeon, like a real thinker, and like an activist”

More importantly, he was a politician, who wanted to use the party to get elected.

Oh, and he had no problem loosely generalizing about A LOT of other things. That was his appeal: the Plain-Talkin’ Guy.


39 posted on 02/23/2010 10:56:53 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim

“he wanted the distinctions to be clear, he wanted to promote our principles, and he wanted to contrast them with those who either had no principles or were promoting something else”

What if we lived in a world where there wasn’t a clear distinction between the major parties? Or at least not to people who had principles other than growing the government slower than the other guy and policing the world. Hard to promote your principles via a mechanism controlled by people with whom you disagree.

What Levin ought to be doing here is telling us how Republicans are still—or still could be—Reagan Republicans. Instead, it’s all about Beck’s manners and unity and blah, blah, blah. Which is all well and good if Levin’s right. But I don’t have much reason to think he is. And certainly, he doesn’t explain why he thinks Republicans have any principles.

My guess is we’ll end up with nothing better than another Nixon or Bush, which is not good enough. Unless this Bush can do what the other Bush couldn’t. Namely, “privatize” entitlement programs. But Bush didn’t, so why should we expect another Bush to?


49 posted on 02/23/2010 11:04:09 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sergeant Tim
Both Beck and Levin have done more to educate and inspire the public to conservative causes than most any freeper. Thank God for Mark Levin, Thank God for Glenn Beck, and to all those that work tirelessly to reach as many people as they can like today's Paul Reveres.

I suppose I could just go with the flow on FR if I just fell in line and attacked Beck since he is a raving nut... no I mean I hate Levin.. he is a danger to America .... or is it Hannity I'm thinking of? Ya... he doesn't do near as much good as the REEEEEEAL conservatives like the ones here on FR.... or it is the craaaazy Rush Limbaugh that is the worst? Ya thats it! None of these people do anything worth while in educating people about the principles of Liberty! Or is it only one of them is right and the rest are nut-jobs?
Im not sure.... I cant keep up with all the whiney perfect REEEEAAAL conservatives here on who to despise in the conservative talk radio community.

78 posted on 02/23/2010 11:26:32 AM PST by GregoTX (When people find they can vote themselves money it will herald the end of the republic. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson