To: American Dream 246; potlatch; devolve; PhilDragoo; bitt; MeekOneGOP; Lady Jag
Gosh, I was sure the Constitution set up three branches, with separation of powers.
3 posted on
09/17/2009 10:40:22 PM PDT by
ntnychik
To: ntnychik
Ein Reich! Ein Sunstein! Ein Fuerher!
9 posted on
09/17/2009 10:46:56 PM PDT by
PhilDragoo
(Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
To: ntnychik
The Constitution did set up three branches, with separation of powers, but Czar Sunstein doesn’t give a hoot about the Constitution. Then again, neither do the Senators who voted to confirm him.
28 posted on
09/17/2009 11:44:28 PM PDT by
kevinw
(Mr. President, get rid of these czars! Czars have no place in America!)
To: ntnychik
“Gosh, I was sure the Constitution set up three branches, with separation of powers.”
Silly you..
To: ntnychik
Actually, think about it. Who would you rather have deciding on the interpretation of law? Someone with a lifetime appointment, or someone up for election in four years? What was GWB doing with his signing statements the last several years?
One of the things I've been harping on lately is that truly, the Framers FAILED when they drafted the Constitution. There were certain ill-advised phrases, that the anti-feds warned about at the time--General Welfare, Necessary and Proper, Interstate Commerce. But there was also the failure to spell out, in clear terms, who settles questions of Constitutional interpretation.
It's gotten to the point where conservatives gushing over the Framers makes me want to hurl. Sure, it was a valiant effort. But the results are in. EPIC FAIL.
39 posted on
09/18/2009 2:51:22 AM PDT by
Huck
("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
To: ntnychik
Gosh, I was sure the Constitution set up three branches, with separation of powers.
You must be my age (70). Get with it. Things have changed. /s
48 posted on
09/18/2009 8:34:12 AM PDT by
Joan Kerrey
(bigger government = smaller people)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson