To: Roger W. Gardner
This is where the Sunni-Shi'a rift actually works in our favor. The Somali pirates are probably Sunni Muslims, and preying on Iranian-registered ships is probably normal for them.
To: Roger W. Gardner
I think “we” obviously know if that ship is “hot” or not.
A bit strange this story would be so low key if it was.
Also a bit strange the US and world financial markets collapse so suddenly and within short period of time after this incident.
Blackmail? Players with butts to cover= Iran and China.
3 posted on
10/12/2008 6:11:32 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: Roger W. Gardner
4 posted on
10/12/2008 6:11:58 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: FlingWingFlyer; F15Eagle; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SolidWood; SJackson; Munz; Quix; GOPJ; Alouette; ...
5 posted on
10/12/2008 6:12:16 AM PDT by
Perdogg
(Raila Amollo Odinga - community organizer)
To: Roger W. Gardner
I find it interesting that the Russians were claiming this was a floating dirty bomb.
Liberals would call such a war “for oil”. The Russians would use such a label to justify their invasion of Ukraine.
6 posted on
10/12/2008 6:19:30 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: MeekOneGOP; floriduh voter; TigersEye
Religion of Peace Ping.
Yeah, what a ‘shocker’. I wonder what the Mansourian Candidate says now?
“Iran is a tiny country.”
“Let’s sit down and talk.”
Well, it certainly would have helped OPEC with oil prices if it had worked.
To: Squantos; CodeToad; hiredhand; Eaker; Jeff Head
Stories that make you go, “Hmmmm.....”
8 posted on
10/12/2008 6:21:29 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: Cedric
I’d say this one is something McCain should address quickly if it’s solid enough.
To: Roger W. Gardner
I don’t think an attack like this would make Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, or especially Hamas very happy.
11 posted on
10/12/2008 6:26:51 AM PDT by
Bobarian
(Green: It's the new Red.)
To: Roger W. Gardner
Almost since this started I’ve wondered if the CIA had a hand in the pirates hijacking that particular ship just to derail the dirty bomb plans. The only problem is that I don’t think the CIA is capable of anything that good.
13 posted on
10/12/2008 6:36:28 AM PDT by
The Sons of Liberty
(Just your average "Whitey" - clinging to my guns and religion!)
To: Roger W. Gardner; AdmSmith
“[Russian sources claim she] was an enormous floating dirty bomb, intended to detonate after exiting the Suez Canal at the eastern end of the Mediterranean and in proximity to the coastal cities of Israel.”
Any source link for that?
Why would the Russians make such a serious accusation?
15 posted on
10/12/2008 7:04:10 AM PDT by
nuconvert
(Obama - Preferred by 4 out of 5 Dictators & Terrorists// Rove>Biden is a Big,Blowhard Dufus)
To: Roger W. Gardner
Two pictures accompany this article. The first shows a ship at sea being approached by some men in a small boat. That ship is loaded with cargo and is deep in the water.
The second picture shows a ship tied to a dock. This second ship is empty, floating so high in the water that its bulbous nose is even out of the water.
Then the article says that the containers on the ship had not been unloaded.
Nothing in this article makes any sense:
Especially the assertion that this was a ship filled with radioactive sand destined to be exploded off the coast of Israel.
Pathetic.
16 posted on
10/12/2008 7:08:47 AM PDT by
kralcmot
(my tagline died with Terri)
To: Roger W. Gardner
Puzzle pieces fall in place.
The plot thickens.
The thick plot.
Thx.
17 posted on
10/12/2008 7:12:20 AM PDT by
Quix
(POL LDRS GLOBALIST QUOTES: #76 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2031425/posts?page=77#77)
To: Roger W. Gardner
For ‘tis sport to have the engineer hoist on his own petard.
18 posted on
10/12/2008 7:18:44 AM PDT by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The Democratic Party strongly supports full civil rights for necro-Americans.)
To: Roger W. Gardner
Wouldn’t it make sense that the crew of such a ship be armed and more than ready to repulse boarders?
Wouldn’t it make sense that the Iranians would use a non-Iranian flagged vessel, if only to deflect suspicion that might jeopardize the mission?
20 posted on
10/12/2008 7:21:40 AM PDT by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The Democratic Party strongly supports full civil rights for necro-Americans.)
To: Roger W. Gardner
and so it begins...
23 posted on
10/12/2008 7:32:25 AM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - McCain/Palin'08 = http://www.johnmccain.com/)
To: Roger W. Gardner
Just a shipment of Chinese milk additive. Probably headed for Darfur.
25 posted on
10/12/2008 9:28:11 AM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: Roger W. Gardner
It's said in the Bible that "The G_D of Isreal never sleeps or slumbers".
It sure looks like somebody's on the case!!!!!
26 posted on
10/12/2008 10:57:16 AM PDT by
Cheapskate
(Play loud and carry BIG sticks!)
To: Roger W. Gardner
31 posted on
10/23/2008 4:43:43 PM PDT by
Taffini
(Mr. Pippin and Mr. Waffles do not approve)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson