Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Roger W. Gardner

Two pictures accompany this article. The first shows a ship at sea being approached by some men in a small boat. That ship is loaded with cargo and is deep in the water.

The second picture shows a ship tied to a dock. This second ship is empty, floating so high in the water that its bulbous nose is even out of the water.

Then the article says that the containers on the ship had not been unloaded.

Nothing in this article makes any sense:

Especially the assertion that this was a ship filled with radioactive sand destined to be exploded off the coast of Israel.

Pathetic.


16 posted on 10/12/2008 7:08:47 AM PDT by kralcmot (my tagline died with Terri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kralcmot

Unless the pictures were not taken in sequence. Maybe the one at the dock is an old publicity still???


24 posted on 10/12/2008 8:00:45 AM PDT by Fluffy Bunny ("This means something, this is important!" -- Roy Neary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson