Posted on 04/24/2017 6:13:49 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
In the wake of the bigot and sexist remarks that Bill O’Reilly made about her, California Congresswoman Maxine Waters is by all accounts getting the last chuckle. A week ago, supports fled his show because of new disclosures of rape claims, and Waters’ voice was full and clear in naming Fox a “lewd behavior venture.” Waters pulled no punches, saying that O’Reilly “needs to go to imprison.”
This is the second round in the progressing war of words between the prevalent and compelling Fox host and his latest dark lady target. As you’ll review, the main match started, apparently, when O’Reilly ridiculed Waters’ hair. In any case, it wasn’t generally ever about her hair. At the point when O’Reilly ridiculed the Congresswoman’s coif, he wasn’t doing as such in light of the fact that he disagreed with her styling decisions. He did it to avoid consideration from Waters’ motivation, and, in doing as such, represented how effectively Black ladies’ worries are hushed in people in general circle. Furthermore, he had his spot in a long history of concentrating on Black ladies’ bodies so as to overlook the substance of what they’re stating or doing. Black women are frequently imperceptible in American open life, particularly in our delegate politics―and notwithstanding when they’re seen, they’re not listened.
Waters reacted to O’Reilly’s feedback by standing up on MSNBC on Chris Hayes: “Let me simply say this: I’m a solid dark lady and I can’t be scared. I can’t be undermined. I can’t be thought to fear Bill O’Reilly or anyone.” And Waters isn’t the only one as far as she can tell, however hers was more open than most. On Twitter, extremist Brittney Packett began a hashtag, #BlackWomenAtWork, so that other dark ladies could reveal insight into the bigot and sexist small scale hostilities they routinely involvement in the work environment. On Full Frontal With Samantha Bee, staff journalists Ashley Nicole Black and Travon Free displayed a section entitled “Close Your Damn Mouth,” which studied O’Reilly’s remarks about Waters, and contrasted them with his past remarks about other Black ladies like Michelle Obama and Beyoncé. O’Reilly apologized to the Congresswoman―kind of. “She merits a hearing and ought not be underestimated by political rivals. Truth be told I committed that error at the beginning of today on Fox and Friend,” he said. “I said in a straightforward joke that the congresswoman’s hair diverted me. Well that was doltish, I apologize. It had no place in the discussion.” Still, he hasn’t quit pursuing her on his daily show.
Assaults on dark ladies’ hair are in no way, shape or form new, nor did they start with O’Reilly. Time after time, the media’s accentuation on investigating dark ladies’ hair has redirected consideration from the critical things that they were doing and saying, and from the remarkable steps that they were making. As law educator Lani Guinier was being considered to head the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division in 1993, neo-preservationist Republican adversaries misinterpreted her approaches, stereotyped her as a “portion ruler” and generally mimicked her hairdo in political kid’s shows.
It’s not just in governmental issues or the working environment where Black ladies confront this scholarly deletion, and it’s not just on account of white individuals. Disguised abuse has implied that African Americans themselves regularly concentrate on Black ladies’ hair as opposed to the substance of their work. Amid the 2012 Olympics in London, and in the wake of the noteworthy triumph of the acrobat Gabby Douglas’ in the overall rivalry, a media firestorm ejected identified with charged reactions of her hair made principally by dark ladies onlookers on Twitter. In the wake of Simone Biles’ notable triumph as the second dark American to win the All-Around Olympic title, in Rio, a comparable discussion about her hair developed, diverting consideration from her uncommon execution and remarkable accomplishments.
On the off chance that O’Reilly was “kidding” about Rep. Waters’ hair to redirect from her motivation, it’s imperative not to dismiss what that plan is. Waters is and has been a watchful and managed pundit of President Trump’s approaches, and has more than once proposed that his activities may prompt denunciation. It is pivotal not to permit a yelling match about her hair to cloud the noteworthy and even courageous intercession in our national legislative issues. In January, when Congress was affirming the Electoral College vote, Rep. Barbara Lee (likewise a Black lady) and Rep. Waters restricted it, and nobody supported them. This minute endorsed the Trump administration. Rep. Waters was met with hush when she asked, “Is there one United States Senator who will go along with me in this letter of complaint?” Republicans booed her, and no Democratic Senators bolstered her.
In the discourse for which O’Reilly focused on her, Waters commented that, Trump’s adversaries “have endured segregation. We have endured detachment and undermining. Be that as it may, we support America, periodically when other people who think they are more enthusiastic, who say they are more energetic, don’t.” Waters and her work matter now, since it expands upon a longstanding legacy of dark ladies’ authority at the national level. She matters since she has set up a striking voice in American legislative issues, and she utilizes it to advance a more popularity based America, while battling for the individuals who have been prohibited from its chances. She matters since she positions among top dark ladies pioneers who have had a transformative effect on national legislative issues.
Open discussions that transform into referenda on dark ladies’ hair quiet dark ladies, and are a diversion from their vital commitments. They have minimal positive utilize and are quite often a diversion from issues that desperately require more consideration. Next time the discussion swings to a dark lady’s hair, recall: it’s not by any stretch of the imagination about the hair.
Huh??? This may be why Black students can’t get jobs where English is required.
I see what you mean.
I am a light, black lady...a very very light black... used to be called ‘white’ but refuse to let that word define me! Anyway, who can I complain about and get money from?
Suddenly, I feel a need to apologize to Earnest Hemingway.............
What’s really sad is that when playing the “gimme a letter” game to name another child in the ghetto, some mamma, when challenged with the letter “I”, came up with Info Fancy...
Everyone and everything offends me......
Send your check to NeverGore@freerepublic.com to free your conscience...... or I'll protest in front of your house in a P*ssy Outfit with 100 of my paid black clad hooded friends.....
Probably used Google translate to translate from ebonics to ghetto English.
I am sending you money because you out-victimed me!
For misspelling his name?
I didn’t, MS Spellchecker did...............
He's trying to sound educated, and failing.
I will cancel the protest once the check is received! :^)
I need to retreat to a quiet room for a few minutes.
Either that or she just got a new thesaurus but never bothered to get a grammar text.
What is this with the "dark" word? Is woman of color now racist? And how did this get from a discussion of O'Reilly to the Olympics. Hair today, gone tomorrow?
Weak minds and people whose very sense of community are bound together by an inferiority complex, which Maxi exemplifies.
“Waters reacted to O’Reilly’s feedback by standing up on MSNBC on Chris Hayes: “
Ha, ha! Hilarious! Why DID Maxine Waters stand on Chris Hayes?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.