Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: SvenMagnussen

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2908395/posts?q=1&;page=251

see post 274— only 1 dependent Maya


93 posted on 02/26/2013 6:14:35 AM PST by chicken head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: chicken head; WildHighlander57

OBOTS have certainly won the message war by insisting PROOF must be presented before trial.

The truth is that allegations are assumed to be true in a civil matter. Court rules indicate a Judge must read a complaint from the perspective the allegations made by the plaintiff are true. If the case survives a responsive pleading, i.e. Motion to Dismiss, then the defendant must answer the complaint with a denial of the allegations. If the defendant does not deny the allegations, then the Court will find the allegations to be true and proceed to a hearing accessing damages caused by the defendant.

For example, let’s say Orly Taitz complained in Federal Court that Sven Magnussen was not eligible to post on Free Republic because he is using a stolen SSN, did not register for Selective Service and Sven’s real name is Harrison or Harry J. Bounel who’s identity I have stolen according to E-Verify, SSNVS and numerous affidavits from skip tracers and private detectives.

I ignore the complaint and summons to appear. I do not file a responsive pleading or answer to the complaint.

If that is the case, then Orly wins and all of the allegations made in the complaint are considered to be true and factually based. Since Obama and I are too busy and too important to answer civil suits, then Orly will win every time if she could get past the Motion to Dismiss. No proof will be necessary since the allegations in a civil suit are assumed to be true until successfully defended.


97 posted on 02/26/2013 7:36:17 AM PST by SvenMagnussen (TINKER, TAILOR, SOLDIER, SPY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: chicken head

“see post 274— only 1 dependent Maya”

I didn’t see this earlier. Yes, Maya was the only dependent on the Soetoro tax return because Obama was in the legal custody of Catholic Social Services of Connecticut in 1973 and the physical custody of Madelyn Payne Dunham. His grandmother was appointed his legal guardian or foster mother.

Stanley Ann and Lolo Soetoro were stripped of their parental rights by a Hawaii Family Court in 1971 when Obama returned to Hawaii as an Unaccompanied Minor with foreign nationality. He was taken into protective custody by ICE at the Hawaii airport and then transferred to Catholic Social Services of Connecticut until the age of majority, 1979. On his 18th birthday, Obama was an emancipated adult.

In the 1980 Soetoro divorce, Obama is the adult dependent upon the Soetoros for education. From 1971 to 1979, the Soetoros could not claim Obama has a dependent because he was in the care and legal custody of Catholic Social Services of Connecticut. Consequently, he has a Connecticut SSN issued to him through his legal custodian, Catholic Social Services of Connecticut.


99 posted on 02/26/2013 8:01:28 AM PST by SvenMagnussen (TINKER, TAILOR, SOLDIER, SPY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson