Get ready for the invective “polyphobe” to be hurled at normal people who resist this. The deviants will develop the typical amnesia about ever assuring us that this would never result.
Basically, the young men are just happy to get some.
Let’s spread sexually transmitted diseases even further.
I love the way liberals intellectualize all kinds of depravity
Was God really right when he said adultry is wrong?
Our study shows God was wrong.
The State has already cuckolded society by making us all pay to raise other guy’s kids via the welfare state.
An entire group of people lie to themselves, to their families and to each other about their DNA and how they should behave naturally. Now they want us to believe that they’re happy to be cheated on by those they “love”. Sadly for them, the crime statistics about violence between the sexually confused don’t back that up.
Read the article. Glad it never mentioned the assigned at birth gender.....all were called “participants.” /s
They also forgot to mention that if a pregnancy resulted, not to be concerned since abortion is a now a health right.
No mention of STD’s either. Oh yes there was a possibility of “attachment anxiety.” You’ve got to be impressed by the new terminologies.
Empires rise and all empires fall. They rot in time.
“Deviant adverse and Proud of it” would make a great Tee for the next March of the weirdos. even the hamas supporters would wear one.
How quickly do we go from this to where it is illegal to call someone a cuck?
Do people really want to bath in someone else’s bathtub water?
as a reformed compersionist, I disagree.
as a ewformed compersionist, I disagree
Absolutely, 100%.
I have a decent vocabulary, and when I saw “compersion” it was a word I have never seen or used. So I looked it up, and it came up with “polyamory” which nearly any person can noodle out the meaning, contrasted with “compersion”, which is obscure and somewhat abstracted..
I have zero respect for the psychiatric community as a whole, even if I can recognize there are people in it who I might respect individually.
I love to write, and I understand that there are often times when multiple words might be used in a sentence, but only one fits perfectly or very well. So, when I see someone use a word like that, it usually indicates one of two things:
They are trying to sound more intelligent than they are.
Or they are trying to obscure something.
In this case, I believe it is both.
To me monogamy fits with the belief in only one God - undivided love and devotion.
Call it what you want. Even call it late for dinner. It’s still the aimless mental ramblings of someone whose gravely sinful lifestyle has darkened their intellect to a hue somewhere between road tar and pitch.
We need Death Camps and they need to run day and night.
How adorable that the left has pedantic new names for sin.
Non-monogamous relationships yeah like dogs do pass.
Every time i read a pseudoscience type study headline in any non-science publication, my first thought is “More Bullsht “.
Polyfidelity, there's your oxymoron of the day...
