Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FLT-bird
I am surprised Trump’s lawyer did not argue that if the president does not enjoy immunity from prosecution by a DA for his official acts as president, then the proper way to bring such a case was impeachment by the House of Representatives and trial by the Senate.

If you listened to or read the testimony, you would know that he did argue that very point.

26 posted on 04/26/2024 6:21:40 AM PDT by USS Alaska (NUKE ALL MOOSELIMB TERRORISTS, NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: USS Alaska

OK. Fair enough. I finally saw an article that actually mentioned this. All the others glossed right over that critical point. I’ve heard one corporate media source after another claim he was arguing for immunity. No he’s not. He’s arguing for the constitutional remedy for any president which is impeachment and trial by the Senate.


29 posted on 04/26/2024 7:11:25 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson