The NY appellate court just overturned Harney Weinstein’s conviction. And Harvey actually had victims. In Bragg’s Manhattan, apparently harmful action that has a victim is not a crime worthy of prosecution. But anything without a victim is. Trump’s problem with NYC justice is he had no victims for what he is being charged for. He needs to find some victims to get the charges dismissed
So far, I haven’t heard anything that has any connection to the underlying charge — alleged business records falsification. The testimony thus far aims to prejudice the jury with salacious BS, and nothing more. The NY appellate decision today was a message?
Actually, Colangelo and co are trying to argue that Hillary is the victim, as Trump allegedly “stole” the 2016 election. Yeah, this case is that insane.
“The court ruled that the judge in the New York County trial prejudiced Weinstein with improper rulings, including allowing women to testify about allegations that were not part of the case.”
i’ve been wondering about that sort of thing for a while ... used to be, allegations that were not part of the crime being charged were NOT allowed in court because they were unfairly prejudicial ... i.e., WELLLL, we don’t ACTUALLY have that much evidence in this case to prove the defendant did anything, but a whole bunch of other people said he did some other stuff, so therefore he must be guilty in this case ...