Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One Protest, 52 Arrests and a $2 Million Payout [in New York City]
New York Times ^ | August 19, 2008 | Jim Dwyer

Posted on 08/20/2008 1:51:21 PM PDT by Zakeet

The city has agreed to pay $2,007,000 to end a lawsuit brought by 52 people who were swept up in a mass arrest along a Midtown sidewalk during a protest against the invasion of Iraq.

They were charged with blocking pedestrians, but videotapes show that at their most annoying, they might have slowed a few people carrying coffee into work. Public order did not seem to be in unusual danger that morning — certainly nothing that called for rounding up 52 people, or spending millions of dollars.

Only two people were tried; they were acquitted, and charges against the other 50 were dismissed.

The arrests were made on April 7, 2003, during the opening days of the invasion of Iraq and right after the city persuaded the Republican Party to hold its 2004 convention in New York. The people arrested said their rights to free speech had been abused, and sued the city and the police.

Now, five years later, the $2 million settlement is only part of the bonfire of legal expenses. And only some of the costs from this episode involve money.

Of the $2 million paid to the people who were arrested, $1,057,000 is for legal fees and expenses owed to their lawyers.

[Snip]

Among those deposed were 55 police officers and their supervisors. Between preparation and testimony, many would have lost two days of regular police work.

The city had five lawyers handling the case over the last four years, along with a special appellate team. A conservative estimate is that the city spent $1 million on the defense, including the salaries and benefits of police officers and lawyers, before running up the white flag.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: brownshirts; convention; govwatch; lawsuit; legalabuse; protest; tortreform

And we'll break Denver and Minneapolis, too!

1 posted on 08/20/2008 1:51:22 PM PDT by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zakeet; All
"Sarah Kunstler, 31, a lawyer, a filmmaker and the daughter of the renowned lawyer, said she had gone to see if there were possibilities of making a film about war protests. “I found out I could get arrested for absolutely no reason,” Ms. Kunstler said.

"Sarah" is the daughter of William Kuntsler. Details below.

"As the [2008] presidential conventions near, more and more discussion is focused on the DNC of 1968. Some say...

The Mood of '68 is Reviving..."

http://www.recreate68.us/

http://www.recreate68.com/

___________________________________________________________

Chicago Seven

"The Chicago Seven were seven (originally eight, when they were known as the Chicago Eight) defendants charged with conspiracy, inciting to riot, and other charges related to protests that took place in Chicago, Illinois on the occasion of the 1968 Democratic National Convention."


1968 poster

The 1968 Democratic National Convention, held in late August – convened to select the party's candidates for the November 1968 Presidential election – was the scene of massive demonstrations protesting the Vietnam War, which was at its height. Thousands of people showed up with signs and banners, music, dancing and poetry. A pig, "Pigasus the Immortal", was brought into the city to be "nominated" for President. Initially, there was a carnival atmosphere. The police were edgy. Some people responded to a night-time curfew announcement with rock-throwing. Police used tear gas and struck people with batons, and arrests were made. In the aftermath of what was later characterized as a "police riot" by the U.S. National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence,[1] a grand jury indicted eight demonstrators and eight police officers.

Trial
The original eight protester/defendants, indicted by the grand jury on March 20, 1969, were Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, David Dellinger, Tom Hayden, Rennie Davis, John Froines, Lee Weiner, and Bobby Seale. The defense attorneys were William Kunstler and Leonard Weinglass of the Center for Constitutional Rights. The judge was Julius Hoffman. The prosecutors were Richard Schultz and Tom Foran. The trial began on September 24, 1969, and on October 9 the United States National Guard was called in for crowd control as demonstrations grew outside the courtroom.

Early in the course of the trial, Black Panther Party activist Bobby Seale hurled bitter attacks at Judge Hoffman in court, calling him a "fascist dog," a "pig," and a "racist," among other things. Seale had wanted the trial postponed so that his own attorney, Charles Garry, could represent him (as Garry was about to undergo gallbladder surgery); the judge denied the postponement, and refused to allow Seale to represent himself, leading to Seale's verbal onslaught. When Seale refused to be silenced, the judge ordered Seale bound and gagged in the courtroom, citing a precedent from the case of Illinois v. Allen.[2] (This was alluded to in Graham Nash's song, "Chicago", which opened with: "So your brother's bound and gagged, and they've chained him to a chair"). Ultimately Judge Hoffman severed Seale from the case, sentencing him to four years in prison for contempt, one of the longest sentences ever handed down for that offense in American history at that time.[3]

The Chicago Eight then became the Chicago Seven, where the defendants, particularly Yippies Hoffman and Rubin, mocked courtroom decorum as the widely publicized trial itself became a focal point for a growing legion of protesters. One day, defendants Hoffman and Rubin appeared in court dressed in judicial robes. Abbie Hoffman blew kisses at the jury. The trial extended for months, with many celebrated figures from the American left and counterculture called to testify (including folk singers Phil Ochs, Judy Collins and Arlo Guthrie, writer Norman Mailer, LSD advocate Timothy Leary and Reverend Jesse Jackson).

Much more...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Seven

Also see...

1968 Democratic National Convention
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_Democratic_National_Convention


Leftwing attorney, William Kunstler

"He was a director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) from 1964 to 1972, when he became a member of the ACLU National Council. In 1969 he cofounded the Center for Constitutional Rights. Kunstler also worked with the National Lawyers Guild. He was a socialist who publicly declared his refusal to critisize any socialist country, such as the People's Republic of China, which fellow lawyer Alan Dershowitz critisized him for doing.

Kunstler's image was that of a flamboyant radical who defended controversial clients, including Salvador Agron, Lenny Bruce, William Worthy, H. Rap Brown, Stokely Carmichael, American Indian Movement (AIM) leaders, Filiberto Ojeda Rios, Jack Ruby, Abbie Hoffman, Assata Shakur, Angela Davis, Jerry Rubin, Martin Luther King, Lemuel Smith, Siddig Ibrahim Siddig Ali, Ibrahim A. ElGabrowny, Gregory Lee Johnson, Wayne Williams, Larry Davis, Michael X and Gary McGivern. In the Brown case, Kunstler worked with Baton Rouge civil rights attorney Murphy Bell.

He gained national renown for defending the 'Chicago Seven' (originally 'Chicago Eight') against charges of conspiring to incite riots in Chicago during the 1968 Democratic National Convention. During the trial, he and co-defense attorney Leonard Weinglass were cited for contempt (the convictions were later overturned).

From 1983 until Kunstler's death in 1995, he employed future radio personality Ron Kuby as a junior partner. The two took on controversial civil rights and criminal cases, including cases where they represented Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, head of the Egyptian-based terrorist group Gama'a al-Islamiyah..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Kunstler

Days of Rage riots
The Days of Rage riots in Chicago took place over a 4-day period beginning October 8, 1969, after members of the Weathermen, a militant offshoot of the Students for a Democratic Society, converged on the city to confront police in the streets in response to the trial of the group of anti-Vietnam War activists known as the "Chicago Eight".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Days_of_Rage

2 posted on 08/20/2008 2:14:06 PM PDT by ETL (Lots of REAL smoking-gun evidence on the ObamaRats at my Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

If the ACLU wasn’t involved in this, the plaintiffs learned tactics from them. This case offers yet another reason why the “private attorney general” section of the Civil Rights Act needs to be repealed.

The game is played as follows: You find a case, any case, where you can make a federal civil rights claim. You then immediately associate all your ideological friends as fellow counsel and you start running up legal fees in the most rapid way you possibly can. If you win the case at any stage, or if the individuals you’re suing just stop doing what you claim they were doing, the court will award you your legal fees. The fact that the other side is incurring its own fees, and faces the possibility of having to pay your fees too bludgeons them into a settlement. The indicator for cases of this type is where you see a settlement like this one where the fees exceed the amount going to the plaintiff.

This technique is used by the left on an almost daily basis, and it makes a mockery of the ‘just’ part of our justice system.


3 posted on 08/20/2008 2:42:57 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Bloomberg probably settled so he can run for governor, and still get the lefty vote.


4 posted on 08/20/2008 3:01:25 PM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Of the $2 million paid to the people who were arrested, $1,057,000 is for legal fees and expenses owed to their lawyers.

And the remainder, goes to the 52, which comes around to 18 thousand each.

5 posted on 08/20/2008 11:05:48 PM PDT by lowbridge ("I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it" - Van Den Boogaard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson