Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

To: Clintonfatigued

The article is spot on. I serve on a public school board and it took hours of persuasion of other “conservative” members to convince them the school district should not start a police force. Every political subdivision in my area including city, county, port authority, marina, urban school disticts, lifeguards, game wardens, environmental enforcement, and so on ad nauseum, all have police forces. And guess what? They all have SWAT teams, body armor, automatic weapons, riot gear and armored vehicles.

The police state is upon us and it is going to take a major upheavel to reverse this trend. No politician anywhere wants to be portrayed as anti-police.


17 posted on 07/23/2014 3:21:11 PM PDT by con-surf-ative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: con-surf-ative
No politician anywhere wants to be portrayed as anti-police.

One of the reasons for that is they reap the benefits of police intimidation of the populace. Keeping the people down.

Let's get real here. Armed and vigilant citizens deter crime and stop crime in progress. Police [sometimes] apprehend the criminals **after** the crime has been committed. Police do not protect us. They can't. Catching criminals after they rob you is not protection.

35 posted on 07/23/2014 5:02:33 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson