The passages you posted do not say what you so desperately want them to say to fit whatever theology you adhere to.
But I can assure you of this: your understanding of these passages is incorrect.
If you want to persist in believing all of this happened in 70 AD...and not one person noticed this in all of early church history post 70 AD....then I cannot help you.
>>Well, I can see you don’t know how to handle the Word.<<
You don’t seem to know very much at all.
>>The passages you posted do not say what you so desperately want them to say to fit whatever theology you adhere to.<<
What do the passages I posted say? (This should be interesting...)
>>But I can assure you of this: your understanding of these passages is incorrect.<<
I can assure you that you don’t know what you are talking about.
>>If you want to persist in believing all of this happened in 70 AD...and not one person noticed this in all of early church history post 70 AD....then I cannot help you.<<
I am certain you cannot “help” me.
Regarding Church history, when the inspired people (the elect) were raptured about 66 AD, inspired writings abruptly ceased. Afterward came the dark or silent period in which Gnostics, Judaizers, and other heretics dominated. Then came those known as the Early Church Fathers (ECFs) from which 1900 years of false end-time and apocalyptic prophecies arose which harmed countless lives and livelihoods. If that is your idea of Christianity then count me out.
You are welcome to try to dispute that bit of history, but include references. I don’t trust your opinions.
Mr. Kalamata