Fr. James Martin, S.J. sports double 'devil horns' to introduce Metallica on the Colbert Report, Sept. 24, 2013.
Posted on 11/05/2020 3:45:28 PM PST by ebb tide
Fr. James Martin, S.J. sports double 'devil horns' to introduce Metallica on the Colbert Report, Sept. 24, 2013.
November 5, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Fr. James Martin SJ reacted to a major U.S. Supreme Court religious liberty case pitting so-called homosexual rights against a Catholic adoption agency’s conscience rights, siding with LGBT activsts and a host of far-left organizations.
When court observers yesterday suggested that a majority of the nine justices had signaled they would rule in favor of the Catholic child welfare agency, Martin lamented that choosing not to place foster kids with homosexual couples is “homophobia.”
“Religious liberty should not be used as a cover for homophobia,” Martin tweeted.
The Jesuit then went on to repeat his usual argument, suggesting that “‘religious liberty’ exemptions are focused only on LGBT people and the only ‘church teaching’ that seems to matter has to do with same-sex marriage.”
“Do Catholic adoption agencies also seek to exclude couples who are Jewish or Protestant?” he asked. “They too are not ‘following church teaching,’ in one case by not believing in Jesus. Why focus only on same-sex couples?”
Martin continued in a string of subsequent Tweets:
To be clear: Catholic institutions and agencies have the right to require their employees to follow church teachings, and the right to decide whom they serve and under what conditions. But increasingly “religious liberty” exemptions are focused only on LGBT people and the only “church teaching” that seems to matter has to do with same-sex marriage. There are many other important church teachings that adoptive couples are probably not following, and there is no exemption sought by Catholic social service agencies.
The same selectivity applies when LGBT employees are fired for not “supporting or conveying church teaching” (in the words of one archdiocese). Yet many church employees do not “support or convey church teaching,” in other areas, and are not similarly targeted or fired.
As a thought exercise: When it comes to adoptions, why don’t Catholic agencies seek a legal exemption so as not to be required to place children with Jewish couples? I am not arguing for that at all, just pointing out the inconsistency in the application of ‘church teaching.’
It raises the question: Is believing in Jesus Christ not as an important a value [sic] for families? No, increasingly the only “religious liberty” issue in these cases seems to be the freedom to target, exclude and discriminate against LGBT people, whether in employment or adoption.
This selectivity of application of “church teaching” seems clearly discriminatory.
Martin’s statement firmly plants him in the same camp as a few dozen secular far-left organizations supporting the City of Philadelphia against Catholic Social Services, including the Southern Poverty Law Center, the National LGBTQ Task Force, the National Organization for Women Foundation, the Feminist Majority Foundation, and the AFL-CIO.
“If we are honest about what is really going on here, it’s not about ensuring that same-sex couples in Philadelphia have the opportunity to be foster parents,” observed conservative Justice Samuel Alito, during yesterday’s oral arguments concerning Fulton v. Philadelphia.
“It’s the fact the city can’t stand the message that Catholic Social Services and the Archdiocese are sending by continuing to adhere to the old-fashioned view about marriage,” asserted Alito.
Fr. Martin is perhaps the most prominent clergyman in the world arguing for the normalization of homosexuality and transgenderism within the Catholic Church.
He has long sought to undermine clergy and laity who continue to embrace the Church’s wisdom and best pastoral practices regarding same-sex attraction, asserting at the 2018 World Meeting of Families that “most L.G.B.T. Catholics have been deeply wounded by the church.”
Martin used his platform at the Vatican-run gathering of Catholics to brazenly lobby for the Church to normalize homosexuality and transgenderism, going as far as urging the pastors to invite self-identifying LGBT individuals to serve as Eucharistic ministers.
Martin’s record of pro-gay activism is lengthy and ranges from his many speeches and media appearances promoting homosexuality to his retweeting of a complaint that priests can’t “bless” gay unions to suggesting that the Church is full of “homophobia” and “marginalizes” the same-sex attracted.
He supports men kissing each other during the sign of peace at Mass, says that a Catholic attending a same-sex “wedding” is like attending a Jewish wedding, and suggests that his critics are secretly homosexual themselves.
At a meeting in the nation’s capital earlier this year, Martin addressed 150 Catholic college and university presidents, urging them to promote “inclusion” on their campuses by promoting “LGBT-affirming liturgies,” permitting students to choose their own pronouns, and holding “Lavender Graduations.”
.publicly declined to say whether he himself is gayFr. Martin says homosexual priests should “come out” about their sexual proclivities, but has
I’m sure the Lord has a special place in Hell reserved for Friar Jim and Comrade Pope.
Everyone know’s he’s a practicing homosexual, right?
The dictator Bergoglio alongside the dictator Raul Castro
I’m back...
Had to get away for a bit... spent quality time in NC Trump country...
Thanks for the ping...I guess... tuned out as much as possible... did not see Tay Tay jump into the kerfuffle...many did just the same...
.
Gonna look into that book shout out.... Do not think Bp. Barron is a Homosexual....but no not happy with going outof the way like that-
was happy that WOF took a shot at the Chicoms...for “Not made in China” sentiments.... but rightfully had to apologize to our Chinese brethren.....
We should make sure people realize that the Catholic Church recognizes what is called “natural marriage,” which is truly marriage even if it is not a Catholic sacrament. In other words, the Church says that married Jews, or Buddhists, Zoroastrians,or Hindus,or even atheists are truly and honorably married, if they intend a lasting union of life with openness to childbearing and child-raising.
The Church does not disrespect Natural Marriage. In fact, as Grace builds on Nature, Natural Marriage (one husband, one wife, for life, with kids if God grants them that blessing) is, you could say, the substrate of Sacramental Marriage.
Not so for homosexual unions, which the Church teaches is in no way even analogous even to real natural marriage.
Yes, you have summarized it well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.