But adaptation and evolution are exactly the same thing, same process, same results only the time periods can vary.
Adaption or "micro-evolution" is generally considered more short-term up to thousands of years and producing new breeds, varieties & sub-species.
Evolution in the Darwinian sense of "origin of species" is thought of as more long-term, hundreds of thousands of years to many millions & beyond, producing, over time, new species, genera, families & orders, etc.
But the distinctions are totally artificial and the lines non-existent in nature, since the process is the same throughout, accumulating generation to generation until one sub-group can no longer interbreed with its formerly closely related cousins.
Then we call it a new species or genera.
As for "transitory fossils," again: they're all transitory, but here yet again is a listing of dozens of well known sequences.
bray: "I understand believing Creation would cost you your job, but please don’t play your games here."
But bray is the only one playing games here.
bray: "If God can’t create the universe then there must not be heaven or Salvation either."
But of course God created the Universe and everything in it, that's not the issue here.
The issue here is whether physical evidence left by God as He created can be trusted as validly suggesting His methodology?
Science says "yes" and bray says "no", but all of bray's reasoning is faulty and based on a particular reading of the Bible rather than natural science.
You atheists are so obsessed with your cult you can’t even stand anyone to believe in something else. You even have to change the meaning of transition to make it fit your little Godless explanation.