Massive Genetic Study Reveals 90 Percent Of Earth’s Animals Appeared At The Same Time

Tech Times ^ | 30 May 2018, | Nicole Arce

[bray]

Do you realize the planets and stars travel thousands of times the speed of light in a vacuume w/o other stars and planets.

This would mean the big bang would happen thousands if not billions of times faster than your High Priests of Science theorized? If that was true then there would not be billions of years for evolution to happen but thousands of years.

Too bad science keeps on proving itself wrong and God right. I just don’t have the faith or acceptance to be an atheist like you guys.

Do you all believe in Global Warming too?

[Dagnabitt]

...As a life long Christian (preacher's daughter), I try to inject some "theology" into my classes by pointing out that the sequence of events described in the first chapter of Genesis corresponds to what biologist believe is the sequence of events in evolution. Remember that evolution is a THEORY, which means it does have evidence to support it, but it is not FACT. No one except God was there when the world was created! The existence of God is not questionable, in my opinion, but students who have taken a General Biology course have to have some understanding of the theory of evolution. The mechanism for evolution (natural selection) still occurs today as is indicated by the development of resistant bacteria due to the overuse of antibiotics. The bacteria that can survive in the presence of the antibiotic are the ones that end up passing their resistant genes on to the next generation of bacteria.

Good post.

[editor-surveyor]

.
>> “Well said!” echoed through the empty chamber of the two reality deniers.

[editor-surveyor]

.
They’ll believe anything that allows them to ‘correct’ the word of Yehova.
.

[editor-surveyor]

.
Did you post to the wrong guy?
.

[bray]

Probably.

[Armscor38]

“Man, horse, dog, cat, elephant.”

Where is your evidence that the examples you gave aren’t transitory?

[bray]

Are you that insecure of your cult that you have to attack anyone who dares to question your faith?

Explain how Job wrote this 8,000 years ago:

Job 26:7
He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.

Science was wrong for 7,800 years about this when the Bible was accurate.

[BroJoeK]

bray to srmorton: "Really?
You conflate adaptation to evolution and call yourself a scientist?
When did science stop being skeptical of groupthink?
Name one transitory fossil."

But adaptation and evolution are exactly the same thing, same process, same results only the time periods can vary.
Adaption or "micro-evolution" is generally considered more short-term up to thousands of years and producing new breeds, varieties & sub-species.
Evolution in the Darwinian sense of "origin of species" is thought of as more long-term, hundreds of thousands of years to many millions & beyond, producing, over time, new species, genera, families & orders, etc.

But the distinctions are totally artificial and the lines non-existent in nature, since the process is the same throughout, accumulating generation to generation until one sub-group can no longer interbreed with its formerly closely related cousins.
Then we call it a new species or genera.

As for "transitory fossils," again: they're all transitory, but here yet again is a listing of dozens of well known sequences.

bray: "I understand believing Creation would cost you your job, but please don’t play your games here."

But bray is the only one playing games here.

bray: "If God can’t create the universe then there must not be heaven or Salvation either."

But of course God created the Universe and everything in it, that's not the issue here.
The issue here is whether physical evidence left by God as He created can be trusted as validly suggesting His methodology?
Science says "yes" and bray says "no", but all of bray's reasoning is faulty and based on a particular reading of the Bible rather than natural science.

[bray]

You atheists are so obsessed with your cult you can’t even stand anyone to believe in something else. You even have to change the meaning of transition to make it fit your little Godless explanation.

[BroJoeK]

srmorton: "By the way, I live in NC (part of the "Bible Belt") and have had my current teaching job for almost 35 years so I am really not afraid my that my Christian faith will cost me my job!"

When I was a young boy we lived in NC and my mother first taught us about dinosaurs.
They did not in the least disturb her beliefs & faith in the Bible or God's promises.
When I had a question about a dinosaur book, Mom encouraged me to write the author & ask, which I did.

Oh, you wonder, what question would a nine-year old boy ask about dinosaurs?
That's right! I wanted to know, when Triceratops fought T-rex, how did the author know Triceratops might win? ;-)

Well, in due time the author (a woman iirc) wrote back with a nice answer pointing to Triceratops long sharp horns & huge bony shield.
Remember, this was many years before Godzilla and Gamera movies and when those did arrive, they interested me far less than old T-Rex vs. Triceratops.

[BroJoeK]

editor-surveyor: "Your childish level of reply has become your trademark."

I try to reply at the level appropriate to your post.
In this particular case you posted your false opinions as if they were true facts, so I replied by pointing out how ridiculous they are.

When you post a serious argument, I'll give you a serious reply.

[editor-surveyor]

.
Continued childish replies by BroJoe; how unusual... (NOT!)
.

[BroJoeK]

PeterPrinciple: "Your abiogenesis is the essence of spontaneous generation."

Nonsense, it's the opposite, beginning with the fact that there's nothing "spontaneous" about it.
But more important, remember the definition of "spontaneous generation":

"Spontaneous generation refers to an obsolete body of thought on the ordinary formation of living organisms without descent from similar organisms."

Abiogenesis is entirely descent from similar organisms or organic chemistry, as the case may be.

So Abiogenesis fails both key tests of "spontaneous generation" -- it's not spontaneous and it's not "without descent from similar organisms".

[BroJoeK]

editor-surveyor: "Except for the spontaneous appearance of 'billions of years' when time itself was created 6000 years ago."

That is your opinion based on your own interpretation of Biblical verses, and you're entitled to it.
But it's not natural-science and so far as we can tell, never will be.

[BroJoeK]

editor-surveyor: "Nobody has any problem with science, but science and evolution are polar opposites.
Science is careful honest observation, while evolution is the name of one of the absurdest lies of all time."

Once again, that's your opinion only, not science.
In real science evolution theory is the basis for many scientific fields, especially in biology, medicine & DNA studies, also geology and paleontology with its time scales confirmed by physics & astronomical observations, etc.

For you to claim otherwise is, ahem, "one of the absurdest lies of all time."

[BroJoeK]

editor-surveyor: "You’re refusing to deal with the scientific reality that here at the point of creation, all the time that exists is a bit over 6000 years."

Again you repeat your theological opinion as if it were scientific fact, when it's not, regardless of how often you repeat it.

[BroJoeK]

bray: "Believe your fake science since you are a fundamentalist and cannot see the monstrous gaps in the fraud."

{sigh}
How are your words here not condescending?

bray: "At least nobody will accuse you of being a anti-science Christian and can maintain your condescending attitude most Darwinists posses."

Appears to me you're just projecting your own feelings onto others.

[BroJoeK]

editor-surveyor: "If you want time beyond the available 6000 years at our location, you need to find a way to get there,and you’d better hurry, because space-time is scheduled to be un-created in about 1000 years, at the end of the 1000 year demonstration of the total depravity of man. (Peter wrote about it, and so did John)"

And yet again, your theological opinion, not a scientific observation or theory.

[BroJoeK]

bray: "Do you realize the planets and stars travel thousands of times the speed of light in a vacuume w/o other stars and planets."

That is neither a scientific observation nor natural explanation.