To: SeekAndFind; elcid1970; taxcontrol; Fiji Hill; rdl6989; pnz1; robroys woman; semaj
No.
And since Jesus explicitly called marriage-after-divorce "adultery," ---- three times --- I wouldn't attend a straight "second marriage" either.
How about you?
49 posted on
04/24/2018 10:44:05 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(The Bible tells me so.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
50 posted on
04/24/2018 10:45:29 AM PDT by
robroys woman
(So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Oh wow, now you gone and done it. I’ll leave you to ward off the incoming flames yourself haha.
To the subject of the thread though, I wouldn’t attend a “marriage” between two homesexuals either. Might give the wrong impression that I, as a practicing Catholic, endorse such a union when I do not (even if I don’t say a thing).
To: Mrs. Don-o
<{>
"I wouldn't attend a straight "second marriage" either. "Apples and oranges, and you know it.
114 posted on
04/24/2018 2:32:58 PM PDT by
semaj
(U\)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Depends on the “second marriage.” Is the person a widow/widower?
129 posted on
04/25/2018 7:10:14 AM PDT by
fwdude
(History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
... since Jesus explicitly called marriage-after-divorce "adultery," ---- three times --- I wouldn't attend a straight "second marriage" either. How about you?
How about marriage after a Catholic "annulment?" Would you attend? What if it was a former marriage of many year with multiple children as a result?
134 posted on
04/25/2018 7:18:18 AM PDT by
fwdude
(History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson