Replies

Are you serious? Where in Acts or 1 Corinthians - the only books within the inspired record what the NT church did and how they understood the gospels where the Lord's supper may be said to be described besides (Jude's mere mention of the "feat of charity") is it even inferred that what was consumed was a wafer of bread placed on the tongue by a Catholic priest (which as shown , were not NT presbuteros)?

As for the rest of your prolix posting of propaganda, so save typing: The Lord's Supper: metaphorical commemoration or the consumption of the metaphysical "real" body and blood of the Lord Jesus?

(Note: allow scripts for pop up Bible verses

Table of Contents

Introduction

1. Catholic teaching on the Eucharist

2. Metaphorical versus literal language

3. Supper accounts and John 6: Conformity to Scripture, and consequences of the literalistic interpretation.

4. 1Cor. 10,11

5. The Lord's Supper in the record and descriptions of the New Testament church

6. Purely literal versus the contrived Catholic interpretation

7. The nature of the Catholic metaphysical explanation

8. The Lord's Supper is not a sacrifice for sins

9. Absence of the sacerdotal Eucharistic priesthood

10. Metaphorical view of Jn. 6 is not new.

11. Endocannibalism

12. Conclusion