[boatbums]

To accompany your massive litany of personal insults born in total falsehood. (and many of them totally libelous, should the target ever read the Religion Forum and choose to act)

Don't worry, AMPU, I doubt Michael Rood has anything with which to claim libel and, so far, E-S has yet to disclaim ANY of the points of theology Rood DID at one time espouse and, for all we know, still holds. These are hardly "total falsehoods" and E-S is the one tossing out the personal insults. Need some Windex for your mirror, there, E-S?

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Thanks for the thoughts!

Being a lightening rod is no problem when you’re well grounded.

:-)

PS - e-s has yet to come clean about his beliefs, as you made clear.

[editor-surveyor]

.
Spreading deliberate falsehood about one of Yehova’s chief servants is not a path to the righteousness required for admittance to the Wedding Feast.

Michael Rood preaches the word of Yehova, and nothing else.

I have viewed every teaching he has produced, and absolutely nothing matches any of the deliberate false accusations you have promoted here.

Its all the plain pure word of Yehova.

Stop using the adversary's web sites as your source, and you will do well.

Take a clue: Attacks by name always come from the adversary, and are aimed at those doing the most damage to his false gospel.

The Holy Spirit works against the actual falsehood, like the "Saved by Grace" inherited lie. .