And of course, you have to ‘correct’ the KJB in order to make your point.
No thanks.
And, of course, you have to twist my words again to make yours.
I did not "correct" the KJV. The KJV's term is correct. I merely ensured that it was defined properly. It was your understanding of that term that required correction.
On the surface, it would appear that you are arguing that the KJV says all three divine persons of the Trinity were incarnate in Jesus Christ, rather than the Son only. Wouldn't it be ironic if you were straining at the gnat of Bible versions while swallowing the camel of a major Christological heresy...