Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Jan_Sobieski

NIV is a translation, not a paraphrase


27 posted on 04/08/2017 9:03:51 AM PDT by NEPA (Repeal the 17th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: NEPA

If it is, then the znaiV is oneof the worst translations ever. It simply does not follow thenhebrew texts and even leaves some huge meanings aside that the KjV kept.


34 posted on 04/08/2017 9:29:52 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: NEPA
'Tis a little of both.
The first concern of the translators has been the accuracy of the translation and its fidelity to the thought of the Biblical writers.
 
They have weighed the significance of the lexical and grammatical details of the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts.
At the same time, they have striven for more than a word-for-word translation.
 
Because thought patterns and syntax differ from language to language, faithful communication of the meaning of the writers of the Bible demands frequent modifications in sentence structure and constant regard for the contextual meaning of words.
 
 
http://www.bible-researcher.com/niv-preface.html
 
 

100 posted on 04/09/2017 11:53:22 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson