Your hysterics are unwarranted, I’ve not advocated any religion, nor do I intend to do so.
OIC.
Then it would rationally follow that the caucus designation within religion forum is improper classification for "what you are trying to do". I see that a forum moderator has changed the bracketed;
What you are undeniably advocating could be described as King James Only Movement which is but a subset of religious thought (and belief) while having attempted to silence (through caucus designation) any who disagreed with those particular thoughts.
Take a look around. You have lost that battle.
I am a long-term veteran of this forum. I've spent quite a lot of time in the "religion" sub-forum of FR. No 'snowflake' here, FRiend, more like a battle-scarred vet -- if you only knew what I've been through here on the FR RF when it comes to dealing with game-playing mind-trippers with mouthfuls of accusation they hurl at any who dare oppose their "thinking".
I know the rules, and understand pretty well the reasons & rationales behind the how & why those those came into existence.
Obviously, a moderator, possibly a (or "the") Religion Forum moderator agreed enough with what myself and others were trying to tell you, that they at least removed the caucus designation. Are FR forum moderators "snowflakes" too, for having done so?
Now it's wide open to discuss King James Bible. That could be a good thing. As long as participants take care to not toss "the baby" out with the bathwater...