Hypocrisy is merely the topic for today. Because Caucus rules state that KJB verses be used when posting scripture, that in no way gives credence to any of your personal suspicions.
No. We can't. It would be impossible. Already, in comment #57 the NIV was discussed, even criticized. Not that that breaks my puny suffering heart, or something..
If we were to have a number of different 'caucus' designations protecting different English language translations of Holy Writ, then, as Wyrd bið ful aræd made observation in reply #44
Is freedom of association dead in our Free Republic? What business is it of yours or any ones, who members of this Caucus associate with, no one is forcing you to click on the link, no my friend you did that of your own freewill, and then because you object to what you read, you want to ban others who want to participate. Shame on you, this is not Red China.
I provided examples of your own words.
Nobody gets to 'caucus up' then take potshots from behind walls which shield their own words (and themselves) from criticism.
Your opening salvo against Congressional Freedom Caucus (mild as that salvo was) was doing that thing while hiding behind KJV Bible.
Now you hide behind FR membership, and freedom itself? That's despicable.
I rationally cannot be "wanting to ban others from participating" when opposing a caucus designation which bans people from participating. What I am against is yourself being in any way empowered to ban others under rules which you arbitrarily create, seeking to enforce that nonsense underneath FR RF rules.
No. Shame on you for trying to exploit the rules and take advantage of those to create your own little cult of butthurt, here on FR. There was a cadre of SLC Mormons who tried to pull a similar kind of maneuver about 8 to 9 years ago. Most of them ended up zotted right back to Utah.