I could answer them directly, but there was a group of much wiser theologians (despite what some may say, we are all theologians; some are wiser than others) than I who have studied this, and came to the following conclusions (with Biblical references):
If you can't answer it directly and must rely upon someone "wiser than you" to explain it, then sounds like we've went as far down this dead-end rabbit hole as we, or anyone else, can go.
Sorry, but I remain unconvinced everyone's destiny, both here and in the hereafter, is predetermined. Thanks for the ride on your merry-go-round. :)
amorphous,
I have not always been a Calvinist. In fact, I had similar issues with predestination versus free will. But as I studied it, I had to admit that I agreed that man is free to do within his nature, but his fallen nature is not inclined toward God, and only God can change a man’s nature. And God, by His Divine Will, will cause all things to happen for His Glory and the good of His elect.
Now, I don’t believe that election is an issue that one must believe for salvation. I believe unconditional election is plainly taught in the Bible, but is troubling to man. So I have no issue with those who may not agree.
I have answered plainly what I believe.
Thank you for the polite discourse on a difficult topic.
Grace and peace,
K51