Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

Undoubtedly they did not see a 14th century manuscript.

Jerome, at least, saw something that agreed with this manuscript in one point against the Greek, as he comments on it noting that the Hebrew original is more clear than the Greek on a particular point and explaining how the Hebrew reads. Going through the Fathers in detail on this point would be interesting but beyond my temporal capabilities at the moment.

They also never saw your Bible. Or Nestle Aland. Or a whole host of other things. A few may have seen Sinaticus.

If you think Jerome is a liar, then you have some serious thinking to do about how God preserved the bulk of revelation for the bulk of Christians for the bulk of the History of the Church, for they were dependant on Jerome and his judgment, and were definitely not reading the SP.


128 posted on 02/04/2017 12:43:15 AM PST by Hieronymus (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: Hieronymus

“Jerome, at least, saw something that agreed with this manuscript in one point against the Greek”

Which doesn’t really establish much more than that a Hebrew version existed, and that the Rabbis copied at least one part of it faithfully. I wouldn’t extrapolate that to assume they copied everything else faithfully.


189 posted on 02/04/2017 7:03:08 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson