[BlueDragon]

I didn't ask you to tell me "If you knew, you would know".

What I may know (or not) was and is entirely beside the point.

Instead of this now landing upon little me, I asked you questions driving towards how did you make your initial determination.

Telling me what you just did is dodgy AND needlessly insulting (insulting in tone, at least).

Argument by way of assertion, doesn't quite cut it either -- even if one is correct -- not when having just used Hebrew script as supporting device.

The rest of my questioning to you was more along lines of how you came about understanding Hebrew script. That is, if you do. And you would have had to, if the link you provided were to be sufficient "evidence" in support of your assertion.

Well, do you?

[BlueDragon]

I* see need for slight correction to what I just said to you, that last reply; Should have been, would have been more precise to have said something more like;

"...when having just used as supporting device for your assertion a link to a webpage which had Hebrew script".

[af_vet_1981]

Yes, I linked to the Hebrew text directly and did not require any supporting study aids. It really is very simple, “the woman” is right there.