Argue with Him. Send your insults to Him, oh dry one. It will get you about as far as twisted, false accusations (intended against myself, I take it) will get you, around here.
You may as well take your disagreements with, and continual open rebellion against the Word of God, to Him...for in effect... there is much about Roman Catholicism (theologically and historically speaking, both) which is fundamentally, in essence -- blasphemous.
He could sort it all out for you, if you would only let Him.
Repent, and Believe, yourself why-don't-you?
You demand that of others....
Do that which you demand of others, and perhaps then you may have some degree of credibility.
But what's up with the
implied accusatory, anyway?
Otherwise, I'll most certainly freely confess to posting links to music vids having long done so far, far less for the "video" portions, than the music itself.
Linking to music, including 'rock' music (or any other type) does not nullify in the least whatever element of truths I do point towards, any more than shooting a disliked, unwelcome messenger could ever nullify (kill off) truth, along with the mere messenger.
Forget to include an intended link;
Do you have any idea how impossibly self-refuting & illogical your sedevacantist explanatory on this thread have been? More than a few have been trying to draw your attention to that very thing.
Perhaps you could find a place in the sun (so to speak) with Old Catholics?
Oops! my bad (again), I see they do not "accept" even Vatican I, whereas you appear to, while not accepting Vatican II.
Dear, oh dear, what to do, what to do...
Is there room at the inn (so to speak) at 'Most Holy Family' monastery, would one think?
They may, or may not look forwards to having cope with yet another living carcass, but I'd bet the farm they'd be willing to accept ca$h (and check, what the heck, maybe even debit & credit card?) donations, possible tho$e same in form of "tithe$".
If not accepting "tithe" there... then where would the likes of a 'Most Holy Family' monastery direct one to instead send that sort of thing?
Is there a legitimate location (where Christ's true church) can be found -- since (as according to your lights, I take it) the 'Catholic' Church as presently administered from Vatican City, is less-than fully up to the sought after fullest par, in regards to top-most levels of administration, at the least. I mean, since according to you, generally speaking, the popes since some time near-around era of the promulgation of Vatican II have all been illegitimate. Didn't you say as much?
These sort of questions are fair (enough) at this point, being as you have postured here that it would not be me, myself, or I, who should be consulted.
While we are at it -- what makes your own views and opinions worth anything?
You have some sort of qualification which others lack? I mean, other than perhaps, say, a Pharisaical posturing of "I give thanks to thee, oh God, that thou has not made me like that other man, other there, that sinner"?
I eagerly await your reply. Not really. That was a flat lie, told out loud, deliberately, for effect. I now retract that.
More honestly, I could hardly care less at this point, what your views may be, beyond what you've already displayed, other than (perhaps) from standpoint of case study of theologically contradictory juxtapositions.