Which is a blatant lie. Show me one "refutation" to me that has been ignored, while i will show you the spurious nature of what you imagine to be refutations, again and again quoting the very words which are in contention, or quotes by mere men parroting the same bare assertions, and which require us to see how the NT manifestly understood them, which simply does not and never will support your selective literalist carnal apprehension of them.
Now either provide the evidence required by my 5 simple statements or stop engaging in mere argument by assertion.
As for volume, I have dozens of books on the subject of the Eucharist alone. Would you like a list?
And what will that prove? Mormons have volumes also, and which simply does not translate into Truth, while not matter if you have more volumes than the world can hold you still will not find what you so desperately need to show in the life and teachings of the NT church (Acts onward, which are interpretive of the gospels) as per my 5 requirements.