Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur McGowan
It was never officially "forbidden" but Paul VI made it clear that all priests of the Roman rite were required to use the Novus Ordo Missae exclusively. It was not optional:

We order that the prescriptions of this Constitution go into effect November 30th of this year, the first Sunday of Advent. We wish that these Our decrees and prescriptions may be firm and effective now and in the future, notwithstanding, to the extent necessary, the apostolic constitutions and ordinances issued by Our predecessors, and other prescriptions, even those deserving particular mention and derogation. - Paul VI, “Apostolic Constitution” Missale Romanum (1969)

And those that did not or put up a fight over it were reprimanded and/or disciplined.

So effectively? Yeah, it was forbidden.

56 posted on 11/11/2016 1:26:38 PM PST by piusv (Pray for a return to the pre-Vatican II (Catholic) Faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: piusv

That is precisely what he did NOT make clear.

There isn’t a syllable there that even suggests that the old Mass is forbidden. All Paul did was promulgate a new Missal. All that flowery language refers only to the promulgation of the Novus Ordo.

He knew he didn’t have the authority to abrogate the old Missal, and he never did. He knew that bishops were punishing the celebration of the old Mass, but he never did more than wink at this.


57 posted on 11/11/2016 2:11:36 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (https://youtu.be/IYUYya6bPGw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson