Posted on 10/19/2016 5:46:15 PM PDT by marshmallow
Christians across America must express their outrage at the Ninth Circuit Court's ruling to uphold California's so called 'Reproductive FACT Act.' This decision will require 150 pro-life crisis pregnancy clinics across the state to promote abortion services to the women they serve.
Since Roe v. Wade, privately funded crisis pregnancy centers across America have provided a refuge and an alternative to women who might have otherwise chosen abortion. They are vitally important in the fight to promote a culture of life, adoption and health. This ruling now forces these clinics to violate their sincerely held religious beliefs, and it is an affront to our constitutionally mandated rights to life and to religious freedom.
This decision is further affirmation of the importance of this presidential election. Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump will be responsible for appointing the replacement of Antonin Scalia, and—in all likelihood—two to three other Supreme Court Justices. That court will eventually decide whether or not this remains the law in California and becomes law across America.
This law—and laws like it—violate the U.S. Constitution, and they are a violation of our Christian conscience, and this ruling is yet another example of the power of activist judges. I encourage anyone with a voice to use it and to do so urgently.
(Excerpt) Read more at charismanews.com ...
Being FORCED to kill is what they are ordering.
Dreadful.
.
Although we may need to do more than just civil disobedience if our Constitutional rights continue to be usurped.
We may get to a point where other states accept refugees from California escaping Christian persecution.
ABC reporter just said Hillary has an answer prepared for the WikiLeaks question. Obviously she has the questions in advance.
Civil indifference is not enough!
bookmark
If abortion providers do not have to tell pregnant women about the alternatives: i.e. 150 pro-life crisis pregnancy clinics, then I’m thinking the pro-lifers should be suing under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment, if they haven’t already
She was reading replies at one point, if you noticed her eyes darting back and forth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.