Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ravenwolf
It is pretty plain that the early catholic Church did not believe it was genuine or it would seem it would have been part of the new testament.

I've often wondered why the rcc didn't make this and the Protoevangalium of James, due in part to it's "account" of Mary, as part of the canon at Trent when they approved their NT.

That they didn't is telling.

29 posted on 07/31/2016 3:06:16 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: ealgeone

Right.


39 posted on 08/01/2016 7:54:37 AM PDT by ravenwolf (into uakingua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson