Which side are you taking today — pro-Divine Maternity which makes possible Salvation by a Jewish Messiah born of the seed of Abraham, of Isaac, of Jacob as prophesied or anti-Divine Maternity, which doesn’t? You’ve taken both sides, preponderantly on the “anti-” side, and apparently many of your cohorts would rather do without a Savior than have to put up with the Divine Maternity
“... your cohorts would rather do without a Savior than have to put up with the Divine Maternity.” Straw is strong with this one! You know what you can do with that ‘it’s the catholic church way or hell’ spittle. But then honesty is not big with catholic apologists, while haughty arrogance is..
Which? Abraham? or Isaac? or Jacob? or David? You haven’t resolved the issue with that way of interpreting the passage. Of course all humans (including eve) that ever existed were of the seed of Adam, weren’t they? of his tainted, corrupted seed, eh? Yet, according to the version I proposed/swpeculated/conjectured, God could well have supplied a body out of the very same seed(s)(M and F)/DNA from which Adam was begotten; but which the Son inhabiting it, never having contaminated it, and it never having been subdivided, then endured the Fierce Wrath of The Mighty God unjustly; that He bearing the burden as The Innocent Lamb, could satiate The God’s fury for us, and placte Him so thoroughly thast He could offer all of us, incipiently present in Adams tainted flesh, friendship anf Fatherhood through imputing His Son’s earned righteousness in place of our depravity; therefore attributing to The Son’s purchased bondslaves and friends the stat of being “NOT GUILTY!”