[FourtySeven]

All I’m saying is that the Incarnation was/is God the Son becoming fully human, experiencing all there was and is to being human. So what I’ve described was part of the Incarnation. What you’ve described is not. What you describe is God not becoming fully man, because what you describe is Jesus not participating in the full human experience. The full human experience is that we each recieve chromosomes from our mother and father equally.

That’s what I describe hence I describe the Incarnation. You do not believe He received any of His chromosomes from Mary hence you do not believe in the Incarnation because you believe there is a portion of humanity Jesus did not share with us. This is just a fact.

Believe what you want I don’t care. I don’t understand why you have to become insulting

[MHGinTN]

Was Adam fully human?

[metmom]

Matthew 3:9 And do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father,’ for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham.

God didn't tell us HOW He did it. We don't NEED to know how He did it.

Catholicism puts God in its handy little box explaining how God does everything when there is NO basis for those claims.

It's not *logical* that God *must have* done it that way, therefore it had to have happened that way.