Posted on 05/25/2016 3:57:03 AM PDT by JosephJames
Nobody every denied that the Catholic Church has faced these problems from Day One. The Church has never held that all her people and all her local churches are perfect. If that were the case, we wouldn't start every Mass by saying we confess our sins, and proclaim before every Communion, "O Lord, I am no worthy."
So you're refuting a definition of "perfection" that the Church has never held.
Gotta love that Paul fella!
He just can't but HELP commenting on things that are WRITTEN down; can he!?
Uh...
WHAT distinctions?
Looks like the ORAL and the WRITTEN are goinbg to be the SAME.
2 Thessalonians 2:15
"Therefore, brothers, stand firm and hold fast to the traditions that you were taught, either by an oral statement or by a letter of ours."
2 Peter 1:3His divine power has given us everything we need for a godly life through our knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness.
... does not support your point, because it does not say He has given us everything in writing
In fact, if you ignore what St. Paul said and reject Sacred Tradition --- the spoken words and example of the Apostles and the earliest communities they founded --- you're not getting "everything" He has given us.
1 Corinthians 11:2 "I praise you because you remember me in everything and hold fast to the traditions, just as I handed them on to you." And again...This Oral Tradition does not exclude or replace the Written Tradition (Scripture.) In fact, they strengthen each other at every point, since they have the same source.2 Thessalonians 2:15 "Therefore, brothers, stand firm and hold fast to the traditions that you were taught,either by an oral statement or by a letter of ours." And again...
2 Thessalonians 3:6 "We instruct you, brothers, in the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ, to shun any brother who conducts himself in a disorderly way and not according to the tradition they received from us."
Therefore, stand firm, hold fast, and conduct yourself according to this tradition, whether oral or written.
2 Thessalonians 2:15 "Therefore, brothers, stand firm and hold fast to the traditions that you were taught, either by an oral statement or by a letter of ours."
Yes. We're on he same page here. They complement each other. It's good to have the whole thing: neither the Oral or Written Tradition should be excluded. Otherwise, St. Paul wouldn't be telling us to "hold fast" to both.
His divine power has given us everything we need for a godly life through our knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness.
... does not support your point, because it does not say He has given us everything in writing
Then WHY did your One True Church FAIL to teach the seven churches in Asia correctly?
Weren't the 'sacred traditions' not yet in place?
NO; they do not.
They EQUAL each other!
Equal? I'll go with that, too.
OK, tell me who (name) founded those seven churches.
By the time John saw this Great Sign, this vision, May had already come to the end of her earthly life, and gone on to her eternal reward. Best guess is that her earthly life came to an end sometime in the 40's or 50's AD. That would have been decades before the Book of Revelation, which was probably written during the reign of the emperor Domitian (AD 81-96).
I doubt God ordered Noah to build his ark, if He had not already made up His mind.
Show bus where in the WORD that Paul or Peter refer to tradition as *sacred tradition* and where they tell us to adhere to it.
Then give us the list of sacred tradition that has been passed down from the apostles themselves, how you know it came from them, and how you are sure that it has been faithfully passed down without change or corruption.
That was not the point. The point you made was about God in post 101 was this....."God didnt seem that patient in Noahs time. Has God changed?"
It was about God being patient, not about god doing what He knew needed to be done.
I showed that God was more than patient. He was 120 plus patient, waiting for people to repent. They didn't.
If you wish to believe this was a vision that John had about a dead person whose life had ended so be it. I believe the more likely understanding of this was about the future of His Church and the millions of souls associated with it. Maybe God has a Mary obsession too but I just don’t think that is the most likely possibility here.
If 120 years is not patient, what is?
Matthew 22:32
" 'I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'... He is not the God of the dead but of the living."
Mark 12:26-27
"As for the dead being raised, have you not read in the Book of Moses, in the passage about the bush, how God told him, 'I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'? He is not God of the dead but of the living. You are greatly misled."
Luke 20:37-39
"[Moses] called 'Lord' the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob; and he is not God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive." Some of the scribes said in reply, Teacher, you have answered well."
Only God and those in Heaven knows where Mary is. There is no doubt some saints have been raised for Gods purposes.We know Abraham, Moses and others have been raised as surely as there are many who have not been.
1Thess. 4:16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first.
Are there any grounds to doubt?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.