To: ealgeone; Mrs. Don-o
If the RCC has not refuted these apparitions, and I don't believe they have, they're advocating an acceptance of these as doctrine. No: silence at best would mean they do not see it as detrimental and warranting censure, or that the magisterium has failed to protect their flock if it is, while at worst silence could infer implicit sanction, but not as doctrine.
276 posted on
05/22/2016 8:57:30 PM PDT by
daniel1212
( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
To: daniel1212
No: silence at best would mean they do not see it as detrimental and warranting censure, or that the magisterium has failed to protect their flock if it is, while at worst silence could infer implicit sanction, but not as doctrine. Would not silence mean consent to agreement? In effect, consent is allowing doctrine to be formed.
To: daniel1212; ealgeone
Thank you, daniel1212.
Gosh, it's refreshing to see evidence of careful thinking and fair judgments on disputed questions.
364 posted on
05/23/2016 7:20:12 PM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(Mater et Magistra.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson