This a statement I made previously:
But, you still haven’t defined the Father throughout all of this, so I’m not surprised.
I will reword it, but with the same meaning:
But, you still haven’t defined the Father ALL THE WHILE that we’ve had this debate.
All the while, or, for the duration, or, from beginning to ending.
**This is the logical conclusion**
No, it’s your opinion.
So when, in your opinion, is the Father NOT in the Son? And what divine attribute(s) did the Son NOT receive from the Father?
**..forgive you of your sin, and be washed in the blood of the lamb.**
Peter clearly explains where that happens:
“..Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.” Acts 2:38
Actually, it was the light of God's preserved Word, shining the light of His truth unto the darkness of your false doctrine. That's how you discovered for yourself, with your own words, that your doctrine, falls apart.
But, you still haven’t defined the Father ALL THE WHILE that we’ve had this debate.
EXACTLY! The preserved Word of God doesn't need my help, it defines the Father for you, it's as clear and as plain as can be.