Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Sasparilla

Oh. I didn’t know that. Dad was a preacher in NY in the ‘50s and ‘60s, and it was a “thing” then and there.


28 posted on 02/05/2016 7:05:09 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (Romans 8:38-39)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: MayflowerMadam

...Oh, I didn’t know that...

Thats OK.

Uniform Rule of Evidence 505 a guide to The Feds and States defines clergy as a minister, priest, rabbi, accredited Christian Science Practitioner, or other similar functionary of a religious organization, or an individual reasonably believed to be so by the person consulting him. As you can see, the Uniform Rule provides a broad definition; in fact, the privilege would even apply to an individual who is not clergy as long as the parishioner reasonably believed he was. While many jurisdictions have used the Uniform Rule as a guideline, most have altered the definition in one way or another.

For example, Michigan defines clergy broadly, to include a minister of the gospel, or priest of any denomination whatsoever, or duly accredited Christian Science practitioner.


34 posted on 02/05/2016 7:24:41 PM PST by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson