By that logic no little ones can be saved, since they cannot repent and be baptized. We know that is false though, for it is written: Then were there brought unto him little children, that he should put his hands on them, and pray: and the disciples rebuked them. But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven. And he laid his hands on them, and departed thence.
Matthew, Catholic chapter nineteen, Protestant verses thirteen to fifteen,
as authorized, but not authored, by King James
Therefore it follows that if it is not forbidden for parents to bring their little ones to the LORD, and of such is the kingdom of heaven, then it is not forbidden to baptize such little ones. In fact, the one holy catholic apostolic church has been doing that for almost two centuries. The exception to this practice is some of the Catholics who became Protestants and re-formed their own religion, and especially some of those who became protesters of the protesters. Some of them, but by no means all, forbade the little ones from being baptized and established their own tradition of men for that tradition is not in the scriptures.
Infants are also not capable of sin.
What PARENTS?
They are NOT mentioned in your quoted verse.
We ALL 'know' that...
...it takes a village.
The children come to Jesus and Jesus didn't baptize a single one of them...You ought to pay more attention to what the bible says instead of fumbling around with what someone wants you to believe what they think it should mean...There's not a thing there about baptism...