I can’t imagine a lawyer would accept him as a client if there wasn’t a way to present evidence.
Maybe there something that happened outside of the confessional they can use.
Well, reading down in the story, it does appear that the TV station may have put up a graphic that isn’t supported by any of the evidence thus far (On the other hand, it apparently alleged that she was molested by a deceased priest, and since the plaintiff is alive, they couldn’t have been referring to him). The problem he faces is how far the court will let the deposition go. Once he starts refusing to answer questions, his entire testimony could be thrown out. So the first battle will likely be over Motions in Limine and Motions to Compel in connection with the deposition.
Overlaying all of this is the fact that Louisiana law is different from everyone else’s in the US. Different tort rules, different rules on damages, and different trial practice.
Neither side has a great set of facts here, but from what little is out there, it appears that the broadcaster has a stronger case.