>I am not Jewish and am slated to rule over no one.
That’s right, I forgot, you have said that you are a Noahide. Being Gentile, Judaism has no place for you in their worldwide theocracy? Sounds racist to me.
>Quoting the “new testament” to someone who doesn’t accept it does no more good than quoting the koran or the “book of mormon” to people who don’t believe them.
Key words there “accept” and “believe.” That is, after all, the difference between old and new covenants/testaments. The NT being based on acceptance and belief: acceptance and belief of Jesus Christ the promised Messiah of the Jews.
You mentioned Islam and yourself disbelieving the NT, this puts both of you are in the same boat. Both Islam and Judaism (and Noahides, I suppose) claim to keep the law, yet the NT says you are all sinners: Christ said, when the Holy Spirit is come, he will reprove the world of sin...”Of sin, because they believe not on me,” John 16:7-9.
You mentioned Islam and yourself disbelieving the NT, this puts both of you are in the same boat. Both Islam and Judaism (and Noahides, I suppose) claim to keep the law, yet the NT says
Yes yes yes. And the koran says. And the book of mormon says. And the rig veda says. And the upanishads say. Etc., etc., etc., etc. ad nauseum.
The thing is G-d had already spoken and that revelation sits in judgment on all later claims of revelation.
In other words, until you can first prove the "new testament," quoting it means absolutely nothing.
I have no idea in the world why chrstians believe quoting the "new testament" or the claims of chrstianity constitute proof.