Posted on 11/27/2015 8:01:50 AM PST by NRx
Didn’t even bother reading it, guess that puts the lose in your column.
Show it. Word for word.
Edited, reworded versions are less than worthless, being like a form of bearing false witness, which you claim to be against.
The ostrich defense.
Worthless.
One of the typical troll-games in your repertoire.
You've been trolling everybody here.
It's going to come to an end.
I'll be writing some letters fairly soon.
Or you could apologize for calling three people here liars.
You did so, even if one has to gather the intended meaning in context. It's on this thread in black and white, the pure bigotry on full [enough] display.
It is good to practice the alphabet.
No apologies to the three people you insulted?
Just more insults, instead. Typical, truly typical.
That's all you've got.
That is all I need.
I thought it was quite telling the word “inquisitor” was used, don’t you?
They’re in a Catch-22 is why. They either have to accept everything and every Pope or admit their religion has been in error. Their mistaken interpretation about “the gates of hell” not prevailing against them turns back and bites them.
Cheap thrills, at other's expense is like white port, or Steel Reserve (bottom of the barrel).
I think some do not notice...or else are too afraid to let go of pride in "religion" and admit that *some* things just do not fly ---for they cannot fly, never logically did, and never will--- any more than a legless, wingless serpent can do other than slither about, hissing and striking at whatever small islands of heat come near enough for it to sense.
Ain't life Grand?
More proof of my earlier assertion, thank you.
A little Freudian slip there.
And I noticed that we're still not getting any answer to the questions.
Not at all a Freudian slip is unintentional, I chose that word very carefully based on the audience.
And I noticed that we're still not getting any answer to the questions.
Yes that is correct, not one of "ex-Catholics" has been able to document even the most rudimentary knowledge of their supposed previous faith. I find it very telling that none of you (all) can explain this simplest of concepts, yet have no trouble interpreting all sorts of Catholic practices.
It is also very interesting that it is the non-Catholics that are having threads pulled for unchristian comments and attacks. Not the least bit surprising, but definitely interesting.
Learn something new... While today i do not think anyone would graduate under HARVARD LAWS OF 1642
What? That is right up there with the claim that there never has been any antiProt bigotry on FR! The only warrant for the credibility of such an assertion is based upon the premise that the poster's opinion must be credible, but which has been decreasing daily.
It is also very interesting that it is the non-Catholics that are having threads pulled for unchristian comments and attacks. Not the least bit surprising, but definitely interesting.
Actually, that is Biblical. It used to be that "thin-skinned posters will be booted from “open†threads because in the town square, they are the disrupters, but now they get others booted.
In a way Harvard Law really got going under Story, so it’s understandable folks make the mistake. I’m mainly aware because it’s all a big stink there, right now, incorporating the coat of arms of that “bad” old slaveholder. It’s sort of fun to watch from a distance, and I’m still allowed to eat unsalted popcorn.
Be carful on these overly broad generalizations. On the evening of July 19th four non-Catholics were banned for comments that they made to the management. Are you implying that he management of this site is thin skinned and disruptive?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.