Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueNgold
There is an implied power and persuasion available from the pulpit, and it is a slippery and dangerous path when men of the cloth delve into candidate politics.

Evidence including the history of America in the 1800's suggests otherwise.

Should the Pope, or Cardinal Law individually endorse specific men? Should the Elder of Salt Lake? How about brother Graham? Do we want preacher Joel to tell us who he supports specifically? What about Qahdi - should he support individual candidates by name?

That is up to them, but history suggest as long as there is NO governmental interference or meddling in such endorsement, the society as a whole benefits.

19 posted on 11/26/2015 9:47:20 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Jim 0216

There’s a lot of things from the 1800s I don’t care to repeat...

Face it - we disagree.
It’s ok.
It really is.

You won’t convince me, so please stop trying.


20 posted on 11/26/2015 10:01:30 AM PST by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson