Posted on 11/11/2015 3:08:52 AM PST by markomalley
By all accounts, the word "homosexuality," used in contrast to its also-coined counterpart "heterosexuality," is just about 150 years old.
Before this time in human history, there was no such thing as the conceptual construct of "orientation."
Sexual attractions did not define the human person, and people did not presume to assail God's plan for human sexuality by categorizing attractions in a way that reduces God's plan to one mere possibility among an ever-growing number of other "identities" and so-called "sexualities."
Every writer considers at least once in his career, something he has written is SO profound, the entire world needs to hear or read his words he constructed just so
Deacon Jim Russell has come close
So much of today's social turmoil has been invented in relatively recent times
The problem is in the educational process of children
If they are taught gorebull warming is a science and it is offered as if it has been a science since Noah, the children grow to voting adulthood and a myth becomes a law
Good article, Deacon Jim Russell
And next, can we ditch “gender”?
He has stated on numerous occasions that PC is killing us and should be done away with
PC is language and if we think about it ... we incorporate words and ideas into our thought processes because we hear .. over and over .. a word repeated and it BECOMES part of common language
We no longer have to explain the phrase .. we can jump right in on a discussion or argument regarding "global warming", but the phrase is maybe 20 years old
Call it what you will. It has been around forever. It is not going away
But it should never be celebrated. That is when societies crumble It needs to be practiced in private if practiced at all. The closet was not a bad thing. Hide your shame homos.
Plus let’s stop calling it “gay”, there is nothing happy about it.
Yep, that is why I say that come late next year, it will be the start of the end of the “PC” nonsense.
The big thing left out is the Media is owned by the most evil men on the planet. We should find out the real owners of all of the alphabet stations and Hollywood studios and name them here so we can petition and yes, harass them into stopping this nonsense.
They have compartmentalized themselves into this tiny faction of people that ... if they weren't getting paid for it, they just might be normal human beings we could have a beer with
Did you here what came from the ABC compartment last night ?
"Media" sounds so large and all encompassing, but only the EFFECTS of media or from media are so
Media, in and of itself is a tiny entity
I haven’t followed all of Donald Trump’s public appearances. Does he always say “sex” rather than “gender” and “homosexual” or “sodomite” rather than “gay”?
That would certainly be a good sign!
Well, no.
But we can start using that word correctly.
Which means that few people would ever use it ... which is fine.
The term homosexuality is an oxymoron? Sounds good to me.
Very good insights.
God made man and woman for a reason. The anus is for emptying the body of waste, not for intercourse. The anus is not a sex organ. Homosexuals are suffering from a mental disorder. End of story.
“stop calling it “gayâ€, “
Reminds me of a line spoken by George Kennedy in Clint Eastwood’s “Eiger Sanction” movie-
“He looks like he could change a nine dollar bill with threes.”
I.e., queer.
There’s something to this thesis. While same-sex perversion is expressed in a sexual idiom, it is less about sex — procreation — than it is about rank indulgence and self-gratification. Maybe a more appropriate description would be homocarnality.
Which is not to say that there isn’t a heterosexual {heterocarnal?) equivalent.
What the writer says is true, but it’s almost a fantasy in light of the mass divorce we’ve seen. “Gee, where did all this homo stuff come from?” I’ve contended for a long time that it walked through a door the divorcees dynamited open.
You can’t destroy the home of children and expect Satan to give a pass. All this writer’s talk means nothing without real marital fidelity.
When opposites combine, a new third element emerges that is uniquely itself and yet somehow also part of each. Red and yellow will make orange but red plus red gives no new meaning visually. Same sex removes the artistic/divine element from relationship. The two equations are just not the same product in different flavors it seems but more like 1 plus 1 equals 3, which is magical vs. 1 times 1 equals 1 which is mundane.
you’re too smart for me. always have been :)
i think i get what you’re saying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.