Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
I think Kim Davis would be the first to disagree with that statement.

Probably so, but the fact of the matter is that it did not require her to be a Christian in order to understand the nature of marriage.

I think that is what one gets when one reads a little bit of context into the extract:

It is not because of her religious faith that Davis understands the nature of marriage. Non-Christians, too, have always understood (until the mania of the past few years) that marriage is a union of man and woman. That understanding was firmly in place long before the time of Christ.

20 posted on 09/08/2015 3:52:21 PM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: markomalley
Probably so, but the fact of the matter is that it did not require her to be a Christian in order to understand the nature of marriage.

But it was her Christian faith that was her reason for refusing to issue the marriage licenses. I would say that without that faith few if any people in her position would take the stance she took.

21 posted on 09/08/2015 3:56:54 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson