Just facts.
... seems to me, overly emotional response
Good tactic, attack the messenger
If someone is afraid of leaking details of their experiences, they need to practice better operational security...
Straw man argument, it's not fear. "Leaking?" Nice choice of words.
It has been shown many times that some posters want to find out another's personal information so they harangue them with doctrine from Catholicism and false accusations (once a Catholic, always a Catholic, if you were baptized into the Catholic church (un scriptural actually, no one is baptized into a denomination but into the body of Christ) you are marked for life as a Catholic and you may not leave to become a Christian.
How many times have we heard "you are still a Catholic" "all Christians must be Catholics to be saved" or the use of the condescending demeaning un-Biblical "separated brethren" to infer that Christians that are not Catholic are a lower form life?
but you seem, to me, overly concerned about what another posted.
Your opinion is duly noted. Check your own posting history to observe that phenomenon, especially the "overly" area.
Isn't FR about debate?
Perhaps you should take that up privately without involving the RM over an innocent question?
First, I didn't involve the RM.
I rarely do because I would rather leave up blatant guideline misuse for all to see.
Innocent? (see above) LOL! You seem like Slavation's PR guy...
I simply don't see what you are concerned about.
That should be obvious. Leading baiting questions.
No one asked you about your marriage, and if they did, you could ignore them
Thank you! If anyone does, I will do that.
Or I will make up a long story just to bring some humor to the RF...
And yet, not one roman catholic can point anywhere to the Word where it says we must be "catholic" to be saved.
It does say we are to believe Christ though in a whole bunch of places.
"One indeed is the universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved, in which the priest himself is the sacrifice, Jesus Christ, whose body and blood are truly contained in the sacrament of the altar under the species of bread and wine; the bread (changed) into His body by the divine power of transubstantiation, and the wine into the blood, so that to accomplish the mystery of unity we ourselves receive from His (nature) what He Himself received from ours." Pope Innocent III and Lateran Council IV (A.D. 1215)
Therefore, if anyone says that it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole Church; or that the Roman Pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy: let him be anathema. Vatican 1, Ses. 4, Cp. 1